The Shatzkin Files


A modest proposal for book marketing


It’s a pre-holiday week and a busy one following a busy one last week. So time for blogging is limited and, besides, all you readers have presents to wrap.

But there is one subject to ruminate on just a little bit that came up repeatedly during last week’s business. Constance Sayre of Market Partners and I are doing a joint exploration of ebook royalty rates for a presentation at the Digital Book World conference in January. We created a survey to allow agents to tell us anonymously what kind of deals they were striking and we got about 130 responses. (Market Partners’ newsletter, Publishing Trends, has a report in their current issue, released today, on what the agents said and the full data will be released for our attendees at Digital Book World on January 26.) We decided to balance our presentation by giving publishers an opportunity to give their side of the story, also anonymously (except, since we interviewed them, we know who they are. The agents, having responded online and in privacy, can’t be tied back to their answers. Connie and I are good at keeping confidences.)

We spoke to seven CEOs last week, a couple of whom were joined by colleagues who actually do the contract negotiating. What they told us about ebook contracts is what we’ll talk about at Digital Book World.

But just about all of them made an ancillary point and that’s our subject today. The point they made is that the main task ahead of them in the next few years is to completely reinvent book marketing. There was clear acknowledgment across the board of something that has concerned us for some time: that inevitably declining retail shelf space means a commensurate decline in critical merchandising capability.

Changes are definitely occurring. The big publishers are undeniably SEO-conscious, investing real effort thinking about what search terms apply to each book they publish. They’re all experimenting with Facebook and Twitter and other social networking sites as well. Various community-building tools, including the very ambitious Copia platform that launched a few weeks ago and the John Ingram-funded start-up Rethink Books and its new Social Book capability, are now being tried out. The established ebook vendors, notably Kobo and Kindle (on my radar screen; I’m sure Nook and Google too), are building social capabilities into their platforms. And the established book discussion networks like Goodreads and LibraryThing are continuing to add participants, books, metadata, and conversation that constitute raw material for marketing the next book from any publisher.

There are two questions big publishers need to be asking about all of this. One is “does it scale?” The other is “does it adequately replace the stack on the front table of a highly-trafficked bookstore as a way to generate attention for a new publication?”

If marketing efforts don’t scale, then a newcomer or a smaller press isn’t handicapped competing against a major. And if the new techniques don’t compensate for the lost front table spaces, then publishers are going to need something more. And effort that doesn’t scale takes time, which costs money. Publishing margins have never been robust enough to allow publishers to increase the percentage of revenue allocated to marketing and remain profitable.

Of course, book retailers share in the difficulty. As much as publishers have depended on retailers to sort the books out into sections and featured areas and to bring the customers into contact with them, the retailers have depended on the publishers to make the public aware that a book exists.

This is a big problem with many aspects to it and this is supposed to be a relatively short pre-holiday post, so I want to drop just two conceptual thoughts on it: one a principle and one a suggestion.

The principle is that “investment marketing” must replace “expensed marketing”. “Expensed marketing” is what publishers have always done: promotion for a single title that has no lasting payoff or value. That’s an ad in the paper or online, a press release that gets picked up and run immediately and has no value next week, or a free copy of the book that might result in a review of that book or, most of the time, result in nothing at all. (Thank goodness that, at least, those review copies can be far less costly to distribute in digital form and for that it is worth mentioning another relatively new service called NetGalley that facilitates distribution of electronic copies for promotional purposes.)

What I’d call “investment marketing” is an effort that yields a result of ongoing value: a batch of email addresses that can be pinged at no cost to promote a future book or a relationship with a web site or a blogger that adds to the promotional arsenal available in the future. This concept is particulary important on the social marketing side, which is labor-intensive.

I was glad to have the concept validated in a conversation with a leading digital marketer that we recruited as a speaker for Digital Book World. She agreed that in order for digital campaigns to make sense, they should be on behalf of a block of books — by an author or on a subject — rather than pushing one title.

This is a sea change for publishers who have always marketed one title at a time. It is particularly important to implement as the distinction between backlist and frontlist for promotion — which was always partly rooted in the reality that backlist might not be available at retail months or years after its initial publication — makes less and less sense.

The suggestion is to attack the search and discovery problem, the browsing problem, the serendipity problem, the substitute for the stack of books problem. Or, maybe we’re better off envisioning this as the “replacing the marketing clout of the book clubs” problem.

Introducing a simple concept: the book shopping or book marketing app.

I would happily pay a subscription fee to somebody who would put into app or ebook form a periodically curated catalog of recently published books on baseball history. I want to see the title, author, precis, table of contents, sample material, publisher selling copy of all kinds, and reviews. I don’t care if the purchase is “in app” or if I can click my way to the landing page for the book at my favorite ebook retailer (and I’m easy: I have four of them!)

I am sure regular fans of romance, sci-fi, historical fiction, business books, popular science, and many other subjects share the same frustrations I do with shopping for ebooks now. Any search you do returns more dirt than diamonds, more chaff than wheat, more noise than signal and, for the subjects nearest and dearest to me, far more books I have either already read or already rejected than that are new and of interest. It would be ever so much easier to have all this information presented in an app or an ebook that I could peruse at my leisure, online or off, and which would have proper navigation rather than a constant struggle with pointless links and back buttons.

I think we’ll see publishers and retailers delivering this, or something like it, before the end of 2011.

  Back to blog

  • Noah Genner

    Mike,
    Can't agree more with your principle of 'investment marketing' and also agree wholeheartedly with your suggestion that the search and discovery 'problem' must be attacked.
    Sounding like a broken record…but publishers/authors must do better with their metadata. Only part of the search and discovery issue, but a big one. And a big a part of being able to make 'curated catalogues'. Take a dash of social recommendations, add some good metadata (including the 'extended' metadata you list above) and you are a good portion of the way there.
    There are tools out there (ie. Edelweiss..and others) that can take these pieces and build you a curated catalogue of both e&p books. Not a far stretch to make it into an app or ebook format that you could take on the run. IT is being worked on and I guarantee you will see it before the end of 2011…if the metadata improves.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Ah, metadata!!! As you know (because you're part of it), a very important

      component of the program for Digital Book World. And a word that shouldn't

      have been missing from my post. Thanks for chiming in,, Noah.

      Mike

  • Howard

    Nice and interesting blog Mike. It seems to me that the Publishing industry is having to play a major catch up (yet again) with the other market sectors that have already had to adjust to this change in marketing, and away from dependancy on merchandising.
    There is clearly no magic bullet. And it would appear to me that Publishers will need to adopt a mix of strategies using all of the tools mentioned by you and being used elsewhere such as mailing lists, relevancy selections, recommendation lists, other readers bought these titles, etc. And I think they will have to fall back on newspaper and tv adverts promoting a selection of titles. They will certainly have to work a lot harder as the bookstore format fades.

    I believe that there is a void, a gap, fast appearing between the reader and the eRetailer. Previously readers relied far too heavily on the choices of titles made by their bookstores and libraries. This selection was often more to do with limited shelf space and vested interests of the bookstores. This is changing with the transition to eBooks but readers are left with a vast number of recently and well established titles , never mind the vast back catalogues, to chose from with no one to help. I can see, as you mention, the role the very promising Copia system will offer in this situation.

    Slightly off-topic, this imho produces a real opportunity for entrepreneurship among the well read and innovative. I can see web sites based solely on recommendations by respected readers/celebs/literary individuals or groups of individuals. I can see apps emerging from these individuals/groups and them earning income streams from referrals and app fees and iAds. I can see readers choosing their favourite recommender sites and using them to guide most of their purchases within a few years.

    Readers will increasing need a filter to help them chose what to invest what is nowadays their very valuable (and scarce) time in reading and most people will not want to simply play pin the tail on the donkey.

    • Andy Laties

      Howard,

      So the problem is that readers need help choosing books?

      I am an expert bookseller. I run a storefront independent bookstore. I think this is a terrific business model: independent storefront bookselling. My business is profitable.

      Do you think there may be a role for live, individual booksellers who interact directly with buyers, using two-way video, online? I bet I could sell eBooks that way, and develop loyalty among customers.

      Can you imagine a sort of “Live Videochat” box on an eRetailer website (my website)?

      You the book shopper would call me forth, to assist you, by clicking a button.

      You say you need a good book for a two-year-old. To help you, I have to have a conversation with you. A two way, give and take, between a customer and an expert. This is not Social Networking, or Automated Recommendation. I am an expert. I've read a million books and been selling them for 25 years. I know more that most peer-groups of readers know. I will sell you a specific book by telling you a funny story about the childhood of the author and the foibles of the publisher.

      To sell an eBook version of a book, I could walk around my bookstore (which is a physical place), followed by a cameraman, and show you physical books (all of which are also available as eBooks). You could accept or reject my advice, as I showed you the pages of different books–I'd switch my suggestions based on your personal feedback, and your tone of voice. You might even learn something about yourself during our interaction.

      When you decided what you wanted, I could sell you physical books (and mail them) or sell you eBooks.

      The record of our interaction could be viewed by other readers. My bookstore could build up an archive of such interactions. Other real-world bookstores with their expert booksellers could do it too.

      This is a BETTER WAY than any of the eRetailers currently developing their automated and Social-Network dependent systems. IMO. (I left out the “H”.)

      Andy Laties

      • Howard

        Hi Andy .. I wasn't sure until I got to the end of your post whether you were mocking me with sarcasm or not :) I'm still not sure …. but I'll assume the best :)

        Firstly the topic is marketing .. and you wrote “So the problem is that readers need help choosing books? “. I am not saying this is the whole problem or any way close to the whole problem. I am just saying that I believe it is, and will continue to become, a major problem as bookshops like yours fade out over the next 10 years due to what I believe is the inevitable transition to eBooks. It's not that I believe paper books will disappear any time soon. But the shift will be enough to severely alter the business model of paper printing and distribution. This will alter the pricing and availability and the margins for booksellers and it will be a feedback loop that will wipe out tons of bookshops.

        One loss arising from this disappearance of many many bookshops will be that readers of eBooks, and paper books even, will be left with a real problem of how to chose what books to buy from the millions on offer. In my post I opined on how that void might be filled online by specialist recommendation sites and social reading networks.

        My own opinion is that your video suggestion is not a great one. In addition the complexity and limitations of the video model would not scale and cover overheads.

        Anyway, that bookshops provide this filter to readers is not because of any expertise they offer. It is because they simply reduce the vast flow of books to a manageable selection which the reader can cope with. Readers don't really know or care that it is more than often a filter based on marketing priorities by the distributors or margin choices by the bookshop.

        By changing over to your suggested video model however, the basis on which you chose books would start to be questioned and exposed and your ability to filter books of all categories and make quality choices to satisfy the almost infinite range of customer tastes, would fail. That is my personal opinion.

        Were you to have personal insight into specific categories – for example if you were a long time Science Fiction reader and could persuade your customers that your opinion was valuable – then you could set up a web site for your bookshop offering recommendations, and they could buy by clicking through your site to the big eRetailers, giving you commission. If your partner(s) had special knowledge of, say, Romance Novels, you could join together and offer recommendations on both of those categories. I see no reason, or raison d'etre, for maintaining a bricks and mortar shop with all of the overheads that that brings. But I do see how you could still sell paper books through the same recommendation web site based on, initially, the normal distribution supply of paper books and later, as I comment on below, paper books from a Print-On-demand machine you could keep in a cheap location.

        I can easily imagine a future, in say ten years time, when there may be only one of two bookshops in my own city. I can imagine wanting to buy a book, something like a spy-adventure book. Rather than going to Amazon (and assuming that I don't have a specific author and book in mind) I would go to my favourite “Adventure Genre” recommendation site. It might be run by people I trust or it may have a social reading element to it. There I would click through to someone like Amazon and buy. I can imagine the same for buying a Science Fiction, or a Literary Novel, or an erotic novel ….

        Where I do see a future for a bricks and mortar model is with the advent of Print-On-Demand. I can imagine a bookshop – with both a range of shelves stocks with sample books (similar-ish to bookshops as they are now) as well as a paper or screen-based catalogue. I can imagine readers browsing whichever model they are comfortable with and then going to the Print-On-Demand printer and printing their own copy. I believe this model is the only one that can expect to keep the price of paper books within an affordable range in the medium long term.. I don't see an eBook/Bricks'nMortar combo working myself.

      • Andy Laties

        Hi Howard,

        Thanks for this reply. I am now used to encountering primarily people who believe that storefront bookstores and print books are doomed, when I am on Mike Shatzkin's website. What surprises me is that people who express the opinions you are expressing (and that Mike also expresses) don't seem to acknowledge that a very large number of people deeply disagree with them.

        Over the past few days I spent time with my teenage nephews. One of them assured me that although he uses eBooks sometimes, he prefers a print book when he's settling down to read seriously. I told him that the experts are saying that his generation will be the one that leads the way on abandoning physical books. He thought it's amusing that people who are a generation older than him are telling him what he is supposed to like to do in the future.

        I think it's amusing also. My children's bookstore caters actively to parents in their twenties. These people are presumably in the demographic is will be abandoning physical books very soon. I think it's obvious that this is not going to happen. These people tell me this, every day. They aren't going to simply stop buying print books and start buying eBooks. I think that you do not know the people I am telling you about. They are strong-willed, educated, young, and uninterested in simply accepting the roles that large corporations are announcing they will be playing in the post-print future. So, I think that we aren't heading into a post-print future. The customers will not go there. They will buy eReaders, they will buy eBooks, and they will continue to buy print books and use physical bookstores.

        I'm surprised that you think cheap and proliferating videophones like the current iPhone may not leave me and my indie bookstore colleagues realizing that we have a terrific new opportunity to sell to customers using videophone technology. It seems glaring to me, the working bookseller. People phone me every day who have been shopping on my website and want to discuss something further. If I had a videophone I could walk around my store with, and promoted this fact on my website, I suspect it could be the basis for increased sales.

        I agree that it doesn't scale. That is its strength. You need one indie bookstore, and one expert bookseller. Then, you need another one. A large corporation can't do this. This is something that leads toward a world with lots of small indie bookstores. I will push this idea. I'm in favor of ideas that do not scale. I want local businesses, run by local people — lots of them. I think we can beat the big-corporation model.

        You can use the type of recommendation engine you describe. I will try to stimulate the growth of indie bookselling, to compete with this kind of online future you propose. I think your idea is impoverished. I want you to get out of your chair and share your literary life with your neighbors. You can ignore me, but I think that lots of people agree with my ideas. They're not reading this website, however.

        Best, Andy

      • Howard

        Hi Andy – I wish you all the best. Yes we do disagree but I hardly think that is earth shattering news. For myself I have often said that it will take 10 to 20 years for the eBook to reach 80% of book sales so I am not surprised by your nephew or your own views. My own son in 18 and is a literary writing fan. He hates eDevices for reading with a vengeance. Nevertheless the momentum of change is inevitable and the economics also. I fully accept your view that this change will not occur and paper books and bookshops will continue to flourish, but I would like even more to know how you feel this will happen and how they will make money.

      • Andy Laties

        Locally owned bookshops do not make much money. That is the reason they have proven to be a durable business model. It must seem paradoxical, if you are immersed in the side of the industry that insist on profitability and return on investment. But people who open small bookstores do not make this life decision because it's a smart financial move.

        Remember that the entire trade book industry has been hovering at about $13 billion for many years (at least 15 years) — other parts of the book industry including textbooks total an additional $13 billion or so.

        That $13 billion includes, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Borders, and all the 2,000 indie bookstores.

        This is very small potatoes, in terms of the entire U.S. economy.

        The reason the field is not larger, the reason there isn't more investment in the field, is not because Amazon or Barnes & Noble scares potential players away. Rather it's because most investors look at the trade book sector of the economy and say, “Why bother?”

        We're not growing. We're not profitable. Why would anyone want to get involved in selling books?

        Of course, the people who do get involved in this field learn very fast that you'd better figure out a way to make books into a loss leader for some other form of business activity that monetizes the traffic that unprofitable bookselling generates. Without sidelines and side businesses, we get zero return on investment. With side businesses, we get a decent return.

        So — the answer to your question is that Amazon doesn't make money selling trade books (they make money charging fees to used-book dealers, and selling non-book merchandise) and if Amazon doesn't make money doing it, why should I?

        I sell books because it is my life's work. It's my profession. It's my passion. I struggle to make ends meet as a bookseller, and I'm pretty good at that. My bookstore is not seeking investors. If I get driven out of business, I open a new store. (It's happened a couple of times to me.)

        See? I cannot be driven from the field. What may seem strange to you is that I am not alone. Thousands of kooky people like me are in this game.

        We aren't looking to win some kind of golden lottery ticket. We're here for the readers, not for the investors.

        Interestingly though, our presence is a major wild card for any corporation that cares to enter our field. The fact that we're engaged in a serious loss-leader, negative-return-on-investment project will always make it hard for anyone to make major returns in the book business. Sure, in the short term — a few decades or so — some imperial conquistador can trash our industry and collect all the goodies. But then they go out of business, and our kind of people are still here.

        We are the grass.

        Andy

      • Howard

        Thanks for the well laid out reply Andy.
        I regret to say that I don't believe much of what you claim makes any sense. You must be making money to live on, hence you must be making a return on investment I(even if that investment is the paying of the rent). It's not rocket science and your assertions about investors requirements being different from a proprietor of a small bookshop are simply not true. Investors and proprietors are no different. Each need to make money to justify their involvement. You must be paying for your food, your clothes, your house, your life – hence you must be making some profit. If you are not profitable then you are claiming that you have an income from another source which allows you to run your book business at a loss. I find this a poor basis for predicting that bookshops operating at a loss are here to stay.

        Your view that life is cyclical is an interesting one and one that I can relate to. You are absolutely right that this does happen in many facets of life – long hair, short hair, long skirts, short skirts. But throwing it out their as a bald theory without some kind of justification is not much use. Why do you think people in 20,30, 40, 50 or even 100 years might move en masse back to paper books ? what about the distribution costs ? the trees ? the price ?
        We moved from horses to cars. Is it likely that we will ever return to horses ? We went from the abacus to the computer .. is it likely we will return ? Is there any other significant facet of life that did in fact cyclically return to it's original state ?

      • Andy Laties

        Hi Howard,

        You don't agree with me? I am SHOCKED!

        Independent bookstore owners are inured to the acceptance of levels of return on investment that are much lower than that demanded by people who make investments in other forms of business enterprise. If I make 2% to 5% return annually I am quite satisfied. Investors in other industries, or in larger enterprises participating in the book business, want 15% as a target ROI. That higher number is driven by the ongoing consolidation in the book industry.

        Yes, the book business — both publishing and bookselling sides — is a cyclical business. Here is the reason, as described by a number of researchers:

        “In industries that depend on individually created products that
        appear sporadically, that do not have sizable sunk-costs (capital
        investments that cannot easily be changed) in plant equipment or
        product development, and that face highly unpredictable markets,
        mergers and concentration trends are neither permanent nor irrevocable.
        Research on the popular music industry by sociologists
        Richard A. Peterson and David Berger suggests that industries
        involved in popular culture alternate between periods of competition
        and oligopoly.”—Lewis A. Coser, Charles Kadushin, Walter W.
        Powell, Books: The Culture and Commerce of Publishing (New York: Basic
        Books, 1982): 23; Richard A. Peterson and David Berger, “Cycles in
        Symbol Production: The Case of Popular Music,” American
        Sociological Review 40 (April 1975): 158–173.

        So, my point is that periods of major concentration such as we live in, confront times when the aggressive ROI targets of the concentrated companies cannot be meant. As a result, companies fail, or divest themselves of assets they no longer consider valuable (like copyrights).

        I feel that it's clear that the big companies in the industry today are all confronting serious difficulties that are associated with their size — that is, their degree of “concentration”. We are heading into a period of decentralization. That's the cyclical thing. When the business is more decentralized, the resulting businesses will be in phases when they are happy with less ROI. (I have stayed in that kind of business the whole time, as I said.)

        They cycle will begin again.

        Best, Andy

      • Andy Laties

        also though, Howard, don't you agree that radio, movies, television, newspapers & magazine, books and internet exist simultaneously right now? is it your opinion that everything but internet is going away??

      • /blog Mike Shatzkin

        Don't know what he'll say, Andy, but I'll say this: there will be hard goods

        (books and other hard-copy material) ubiquitously available long after there

        are, for most people, no conveniently located retail establishments that

        have any remotely competitive selection to present a comparable shopping

        experience.

        Don't conflate “the decline of books” with “the decline of bookstores.” The

        latter happens much more quickly than the former. And has.

        Mike

      • Andy Laties

        Thanks Mike. I have been reading Jeff Gomez's book “Print Is Dead: Books In Our Digital Age”–and because you and Jeff Gomez have different opinions, but your ideas do overlap in some places, I am afraid that I have sometimes confused your ideas with his!

        In any case, I apologize for taking this thread so far away from the topic of your original post. I don't disagree at all with the ideas you have fronted in the post — they are exactly the sort of thing I need to do with the Eric Carle Museum online store website, since we represent a trusted source of advice about choosing children's books for our customers, who number currently in the thousands (we do have their email addresses and are doing bi-weekly newsletters that are garnering solid transactional responses). I am really curious about my suggestion though — I have got to get myself a videophone finally, and attempt this idea of selling at my own bookshelves while on the videophone, then archiving my filmed bookselling behavior. I am a much better bookseller when confronted with a living breathing individual than I am at writing blogposts. I wonder if someone else around the country is currently doing this sort of live videophone bookselling. Thanks for setting up a situation where I have stumbled across a new idea of my own.

        Andy

      • /blog Mike Shatzkin

        C'mon Andy. No fair putting words or thoughts into the air, sort-of

        attributing them to me, and then swatting them down.

        The terrible economic climate I am predicting for bookstores is not

        entirely, or even necessarily* mostly, *driven by ebook consumption. It is

        driven at least as much by the combination of purchasing of print online and

        the requirement of critical mass sales to keep a retail location open. Ask

        your next-generation survey population how they feel about online shopping

        versus store shopping.

        You don't make a stronger argument by creating straw horses. Sales are

        moving online. Fewer dollars to be spent in stores means fewer stores.

        That's inexorable. You may survive and so will some others for some years to

        come. But that doesn't change the essential truth.

        Mike

      • Andy Laties

        Hi Mike,

        Sorry if I misrepresented your ideas.

        I believe that the gist of my argument is simply that I take issue with the extrapolation into the indefinite future of current trends. Rather, I think we're in a cyclical business, and that any trend that is currently observable is subject to reversal.

        No question that sales have been moving online over the past decade. Amazon's book sales have doubled in the past five years while the storefront share of book sales has been declining. Very dramatic trend.

        One hundred years ago Sears mail order catalog and Montomery Ward mail order catalog were capturing sales from chain stores that had spread along the railway lines. I think Amazon is an expression of the same mail-order impulse that has been a major player in American life since those days. We have a sprawling country, yes. Mail order seems to satisfy us, in some generations.

        But we also have a highly urbanized society, and backlashes against mail order are expressed in the return of local stores. That's why the first half of the 20th century saw the rise of local indie stores, supported by local politicians such as conservative senators Robinson and Patman from the South, who helped push anti-trust laws through in the 1930s protecting locally owned stores.

        The commercial and political climate changed in the second half of the 20th century, sure. Now we live in a mail order era that is taking over from a second chain-store era.

        I don't understand how anyone can write off the possibility of a cultural transformation of any sort. For me, a renaissance of indie bookselling is simply a matter of timing and fashion and cultural preference. It will happen and then, guess what….it will pass and we'll be off into some OTHER era. I'm simply trying to make the point that you may be right about the next five years of the trend, or the next ten years — but you have no business drawing straight lines into the indefinite future. None of us do. What is old will become new. The old-fashioned will become the hip/retro. Indie bookselling may have to wait for eBooks and online sales to become overwhelmingly dominant before its renaissance, but that doesn't mean that the renaissance won't come, and that it won't be welcomed by the onetime eBook and online book-buying acolytes.

        Andy

  • M.J. Rose

    MIke – great column.

    At Peroozal.com we are doing exactly what you describe – human curators, combining groups of books, a new way of browsing and new way to help authors gather their readers and be able to continue their relationship with them.

    And at Authorbuzz.com with our network of newsletters and sites – we continually come up with new ways to do investment marketing — I describe it as having the immediate benefit of single title marketing with long term benefits.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Thanks for checking in, M.J. I didn't know you were working with Peroozal.

      Good for them and good for you!

      Mike

      • M.J. Rose

        I'm a co-founder Mike from the very first days almost two years ago:)

      • /blog Mike Shatzkin

        Peroozal's a great idea, MJ. Congratulations on being involved.

        Mike

  • http://suecampbellwrites.com Sue_campbell

    “I think we’ll see publishers and retailers delivering this, or something like it, before the end of 2011.”

    But if publishers are the ones telling us what to read, how is that different than now? They aren't going to weed out the lousy books. They are simply going to pitch their list.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      First of all, it depends on the publisher. If you're interested in business

      books, wouldn't you want to look at a well-designed catalog from Harvard

      Business School Press (or whatever they call themselves these days.) Or a

      romance catalog from Harlequin?

      Secondly: publishers are not prohibited from showing books from other

      publishers in their attempt to make a catalog that would entice a reader.

      Remember that Doubleday and TimeWarner used to own the big book clubs!

      And part of the point I'm trying to make here is that the ease of perusing a

      batch of choices could be a compelling advantage. Publishers might try to

      benefit from that advantage.

      Mike

  • Pingback: SEO for Ebook Authors

  • Pingback: Ça ne se fait pas… « teXtes

  • http://twitter.com/emoontx Elizabeth Moon

    Speaking from the writer end of this…I value both the chance to reach readers directly via the internet and the work of booksellers who introduce new readers to my work in actual, physical bookstores. I'm a print-book reader myself (I spend enough hours a day already at a screen) and I enjoy browsing in physical bookstores because I'm not a one-category reader.

    I've shown a link to that specific site, rather than my main home page, as an example of one (just one) approach some writers are taking.

    I agree that writers (on whom a lot of marketing is now being pushed) do much better when they showcase a group of their own books–or join with other writers to do so (in groups like Book View Cafe and Backlist eBooks.) Writer-specific websites work for those who think of searching the writer's name. I have friends in both those groups who are seeing good results from that approach. But a number of us have found that if we're writing in multiple genres, we may need more than one site, one for each group of books, set up so searches on whatever brand fits that group pull in the right readers for the group.

    Back in 2008, looking at the economy and state of publishing (both its marketing budgets and the shift to e-commerce for both print and e-books) I set up a website with embedded blog for one particular group of my books, to see if that made a difference in sales. Toward the end of 2009, I went on Twitter (was already on LJ, LinkedIn, etc. but not Facebook.) There was an immediate jump in the traffic on the series-specific site. In terms of cost to me, the writer, the website design, hosting, and maintenance have paid for themselves in the early sales results of the first book in that group since the site went up. A large part of that is due to the blog: that's my direct connection with fans of that group of books. It's a time-sink, like everything else on the internet, and the solo writer has even less time than a publishing house, but it's been worth it.

  • Pingback: Selling the backlist (and other things) and finding the next battleground – The Shatzkin Files

  • Pingback: A Modest Proposal for Book Marketing | Digital Book World

  • Pingback: eBooks e a venda do catálogo « eBook Reader

  • Pingback: Links Around the Web, writing business, writing books, | How To Write Shop