The Shatzkin Files


Can crowd-sourced retailing give Amazon a run for its money?


Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

Although it has always seemed sensible for publishers to sell their books (and then ebooks) directly to end users, it has never looked to me like that could be a very big business. In the online environment, your favorite “store” — the one you’re loyal to and perhaps even have an investment in patronizing (which is how I’d characterize Amazon PRIME) — is only a click away. So however you learn about a book (or anything else), it is very easy to switch over to your vendor of choice to make the purchase.

There is a concept called “the fallacy of last click attribution” that is important in digital marketing. You don’t want to assume that the place somebody bought something (the last click) was the place they decided to buy it (attribution). If you’re a marketer, you want to aim your messages where the decision gets made and you need to know if that wasn’t where the purchase was made. You learn quickly that the two are often not the same.

There are a variety of reasons why direct sales are hard for publishers. One is that their best retailer customers — Amazon and Barnes & Noble, of course, but many others as well — don’t like their turf encroached upon by their suppliers and they have power over their suppliers’ access to customers. They particularly don’t like it if suppliers compete on price.

But it isn’t just publishers who have trouble competing with the online book retailers and ebooks are just as hard as print. On the ebook side, many readers are comfortable with specific platforms — Kindle, Nook, Kobo — and are uncomfortable “side-loading” content into them. And when you get away from the owner of an ecosystem, the complications created by the perceived need for DRM — some ability to either lock up or identify the owner of content that might be “shared” beyond what its license (which is what a purchase of ebooks is) allows — makes things even more complicated.

Because it appears so superficially simple to transact with trusted customers, attempts to enable book and ebook sales by a wide variety of vendors are nearly as old as Amazon itself. In fact, Amazon began life in 1995 leaning almost entirely on Ingram to supply its product and began discounting in earnest when Ingram started to extend the same capability to other retailers through a division called I2S2 (Ingram Internet Support Services) in the late 1990s. The aggressive discounting by Amazon quickly and effectively scared off the terrestrial retailers who might have considered going into online sales.

When one company, a UK-based retailer called The Book Depository, organized itself to fulfill print books efficiently enough to be a potential competitor, Amazon bought them. Nobody else ever really came close. Borders didn’t try, initially turning over its online presence to Amazon. Barnes & Noble partnered with Bertelsmann in the 1990s to create Books Online, which has continued (to this day) as BN.com. But they have not (to date) managed to achieve a synergistic interaction with the stores to give themselves a unique selling proposition. And the Amazon discounting strategy, designed to suck sales away from terrestrial retailers and partly supported by Amazon’s reach well beyond books, was never a comfortable fit for BN. As a result, Amazon has never been threatened as the online bookselling king.

Barnes & Noble dominates physical retail for books; Amazon owns online. One channel is shrinking; the other is growing.

Trying to do retail for print books without a substantial infrastructure is just about impossible, but ebooks are tempting because, at least superficially, those challenges appear to be much smaller. That may have been behind the attempt by three publishers — Penguin (before the Random House merger), Hachette, and Simon & Schuster — to launch Bookish a few years ago. By the time it opened, Bookish was touted as a “recommendation engine”, but its true purpose when it was started was to give its owning publishers a way to reach online consumers in case of an impasse with Amazon. They get points for predicting the impasse, which Hachette famously suffered from during ebook contract negotiations with Amazon in 2014. But the solution wasn’t a solution. Bookish never had the juice to build up a real customer base and probably never could have, regardless of how much its owners would have been willing to invest.

There are currently two noteworthy players in the market enabling any player with a web presence to have an ebookstore selling everybody’s titles. One is Zola Books, which started out two or three years ago promoting itself as a new kind of web bookstore. They were going to let anybody create their own curated collection of books and profit from their curation. And they were going to host unique content from brand name writers that wouldn’t be available anywhere else. It didn’t work, and now Zola, having acquired much of the defunct Bookish’s tech, is trying to be an enabler of online ebookstores for anybody who wants one.

That same idea is the proposition of Hummingbird, an initiative from American West Books, a California-based wholesaler that provides books to leading mass merchants. They have created technology to enable anybody with a web presence to sell ebooks. The company told us that their internal projections suggest that they can capture 3% of the US ebook market in 24 months from their imminent launch. They promise an impressive array of resellers, ranging from major big box retailers (many of which are their customers for books) to major publishers themselves.

There are others in the space, providing white label platforms and other direct sales solutions, including Bookshout, Enthrill, Bluefire, and Impelsys. And there are distributors, etc. who support their clients’ D2C efforts — Firebrand, Donnelly/LibreDigital, Demarque.

Then, yesterday (Tuesday) morning, Ingram announced that they have acquired Aer.io, a technology firm based in San Francisco headed by Ron Martinez. The Ingram-Aer.io combination will probably motivate the owners of Zola and Hummingbird to rethink their strategies. It is motivating me to reconsider whether, indeed, a large number of Net points of purchase for books could change the nature of the marketplace.

Disclosure is appropriate here. Ingram has been a consulting client of ours for many years. In that role, I introduced them to Aerbook, the predecessor to Aer.io, two or three years ago and I knew that Ingram had invested in it. But I didn’t know about the integration the two were working on until literally moments before they announced the merger on Tuesday. It is extremely powerful.

What Martinez and Ingram have built with a simple, elegant set of tools is the ability for anybody — you, me, a bookstore, a charity, a school, an author — to build its own branded and curated content store. You can “stock” it with any items you want from the millions of books and other content items Ingram offers. You can set any prices you want, working with a normal retail margin and paying “by the drink” for the services you need, namely management of the transaction and fulfillment. And while there is certainly “effort” involved in building your selection and merchandising, there are no up-front or recurring charges to discourage anybody from getting into the game.

One of our observations in the past couple of years has been that Amazon’s competitive set is limited because most of their ebook competitors don’t sell print books. It seemed to me that the one chance to restrain their growth — and every publisher and bookseller that is not Amazon would like to do that — was for Google to get serious about promoting and selling print as well as ebooks. But that won’t happen. Google is a digital company and they’re interested in doing all they can with digital media. They don’t want to deal with physical, even — as I suggested — doing it by having Ingram do the heavy lifting.

Whether any publishers or booksellers or other merchants or entities can build a big-and-profitable business selling books using the Aer.io tool remains to be seen. But it would seem that many can build a small-and-not-unprofitable sideline to their current activities and it would be one that would underscore their knowledge, promote their brand, and provide real value to their site visitors and other stakeholders. Thousands of these businesses could be consequential; millions could be game-changing. How many will there be? That’s impossible for me to predict, but the Aer.io proposition is totally scaleable, so the answer depends entirely on how enticing it is for various entities with web traffic and brands to have a bookstore.

And, depending on the uptake here, there will be some strategic conversations taking place around this at Amazon as well. When they have a handful of competitors selling print and ebooks, as they have, price-matching (or price-undercutting) can be an effective, and targeted, strategy. But how do you implement that when there are thousands of competitors, some of which are discounting any particular title and many of which are not? And does the customer care if they’re paying a couple bucks more to buy the book “directly” from their favorite author, particularly if the author offers a hand-signed thank-you note will be sent (separately, of course) to acknowledge every purchase?

How this will play out is something to watch over the next few years but there is at least the potential here for a real change in the game.

We already had John Ingram, Chairman and CEO of the Ingram Content Group slotted as a keynote speaker for Digital Book World 2016 to talk about one of our main themes: “transformation”. More than half of Ingram’s revenues come from businesses they weren’t in 10 years ago. We’ll see how things look as they start to roll out Aer.io, but it would seem likely Aer.io would be an appropriate add to the program as well.

If you haven’t signed up yet for DBW (which runs March 7-9), the Publishers Lunch code gets you the lowest price.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someone

  Back to blog

  • Peter Turner

    A lot could be said and asked about these laudable D2C book eCommerce efforts, but first things first: consider the start-up credo: What is the problem you’re solving and for whom? In this instance, who want to buy books from someone other than Amazon and why? Enabling online bookselling is one thing; giving the consumer a reason to buy is another.

    • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

      The reason to buy MIGHT just be that you’re offered the opportunity and it is something you want. Could be just that simple, particularly if there is no minimum sales level necessary to make it worth doing for the vendor.

      • Peter Turner

        MIGHT is a pretty weak qualification if one has any expectation of empowering a viable alternative to Amazon. One might be better off considering what other value propositions might drive engagement and sales conversion.

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        It is not the sole purpose here to challenge Amazon. The purpose is to give brands and web presences that might benefit from having a store the ability to have one. IF that proposition is sufficiently attractive to enough people, and enough alternative points of purchase are created, it could have a measurable impact. I don’t think anybody at Aer.io or Ingram designed this as a way to take down Amazon.

      • Peter Turner

        I didn’t say “take down”; I said “viable alternative.” I don’t think my comment was aimed specifically at Aer.io but to the overall effort of creating alternatives to Amazon in response to the post which is, after all, titled “Can crowd-sourced retailing give Amazon a run for its money?”)

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        If there are a million viable points of purchase for many books and ebooks, I think it is bound to affect the sales of existing retailers. What are the odds they can get to that? I don’t know. We’ll find out.

    • http://carlaking.com/ Carla King

      As an adventure travel author specializing in motorcycle travel, I envision a bookstore on my site that sells books by me and the other authors in this very specific genre. Since I have read most of them I can review and comment and sell these books as a known-liked-trusted resource. If somebody wants to go click off to Amazon, that’s okay, but I’ve found in my experience being on the web since 1995 that niche enthusiasts appreciate community and like to support it. Also, as a longtime self-publishing expert, I can see offering great books on self-publishing alongside my own. I’ve been writing about and dabbling with Aerbook/Aer.io for a few years now for MediaShift.com and I’m really glad this very positive industry shift comes from trusted “friends” in the biz: artist-inventor-interpreneur Ron Martinez and the most trusted distribution service Ingram. It’s a wonderful partnernship.

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        My sense is that Ingram and Aer.io see people like you as a real sweet spot for their service. There are lots of experts in mini-verticals with enthusiastic followings. It isn’t a slam dunk that many of them will go to the trouble to create a store, but a) you can’t beat free as a price, b) you have the world to choose from with Ingram’s capabilities, and c) what they’re offering looks simple enough that anybody can do it.

      • Peter Turner

        Community, niche enthusiasm, and trustworthy reviews–all good value propositions that Amazon doesn’t excel at.

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        Right. In any vertical, a knowledgeable store-“owner” will be able to generate reviews and conversation that will keep potential purchasers coming back. The most price-conscious of those might click over to Amazon to buy books (which won’t always be cheaper there, but if you’re a PRIME customer…) But the Aer.io-user CAN discount a bit, depending somewhat on the price of the book, and still make some money.

      • Peter Turner

        As you know, Amazon provides the same overall service affiliate service as Aer.io, even semi-white labeled shopping carts. What they don’t provide is curation, community, (fully) trustworthy reviews, and, most important of all, the marketing tools and sauvee.

        As an overall comment, Mike, I seem to recall an industry insider such as yourself telling me that such a D2C model wouldn’t work. :)

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        Peter, I think if you read my piece, you’ll find that I don’t run away at all from my prior comments on this subject. You know the Keynes quote, right? When I find that the facts have changed, I revisit my opinions. What do YOU do? And, with just a bit of an attempt at understanding and fairness, you’d see that the model “working” or “not working” needs to be seen from a variety of points of view. If Aer.io spawns a million bookstores, there could be a powerful cumulative effect and 950,000 of them might not be “making money” in any significant or measurable way. (And they might still be happy with having done it.)

      • Peter Turner

        What facts have changed? Aer.io has been working on this for a while now and it’s a solution that’s been in the “air” so to speak a few years. That said, back to work . . .

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        Aer.io has been “working on this for a while” but their proposition has changed from a widget that was primarily about the ability to promote in the social stream to a bookstore-in-a-box with the unmatched capabilities of Ingram integrated into the offering. I had written a completely DIFFERENT blogpost that was ready to publish when the announcement of the merger-acquisition was made. That post retained much more of my prior skepticism. Fiddling a bit with their tool and thinking about the implications of the integration made me change my mind. Do you ever change yours? Or is that really never necessary because you just always got everything just right from the beginning (which, I presume, started with Genesis)?

      • Peter Turner

        I see, so it was Ingram’s purchase that was the new fact that caused you to rethink this. That makes sense. By they by, I change my mind all the time. Revisionism is a necessary skill.

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        Ingram’s purchase and the tool set I saw. I don’t know how new that is, or how much it was dependent on the increased integration facilitated by the merger. Until the merger, I still thought Aer.io was Aerbook, the widget capability. Obviously, I was a bit behind on that. What HAVE you changed your mind about recently?

      • Peter Turner

        That would be a long list. Here are a couple:

        (1) I used to think that niche b&m bookstores were not a viable notion. Now I can see now that micro-niche b&m shops (doing double duty as print warehouses) combined with smart online marketing, eCommerce, with exclusive offerings (even lux special editions) might be an interesting approach. And it would be repeatable in various niches, with shared markeing insights, etc.

        (2) I used to think that the sort of product placement links that Smart Demons was working towards didn’t make sense–that it was just a fundamental “mixed metaphor” from user POV. Now I wonder if a dumbed down approch wouldn’t be a powerful marketing and sales tool. So, for instance, publishers could use DRM-free or soft-social DRM eBoooks, linking to related books and other products as a means of driving sales of books and related products via affiliate partnerships (online courses by the same author, e.g.).

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        I’m partly with you on number one. Wrote about Pocket Shops in that context recently. But I dunno about number two…

      • Jane Steen

        That’s exactly where I think the Aer.io offer could work–book bloggers/reviewers with niche interests who can draw in readers with similar interests. It wouldn’t be a matter of making a lot of money, but it would align far better with a book blog than AdSense or other monetization methods, and perhaps generate enough income to keep those blogs (which are typically run for love, not money) alive.

        So is that competition? Well, no. Except when I think about your post a few months ago, Mike, when you pointed out that books selling fewer than 100 copies a year are now capturing market share when taken together. Tens of thousands of book enthusiasts with little Aer.io sites selling 100 books a year could amount to something. And out of those tens of thousands a handful could become substantial businesses. All speculation, of course, but it’s an intriguing thought.

      • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

        Jane, I think there are other use cases as well. But we are thinking along the same lines.

      • Peter Turner

        I’m curious, Jane, if you don’t mind me asking, why not just use Amazon’s affiliate partner program? It offers much the same features.

      • Jane Steen

        Amazon affiliate links are useful, but I’m thinking more in terms of a mini-store. I’m not actually blogging at the moment (in between blogs, as it were) but when I was I couldn’t use Amazon’s affiliate program because it wasn’t available in my state. It is now.

      • Peter Turner

        Amazon has various bookshelf and mini-bookstore widgets that just plug in to your website or blog.

      • Jane Steen

        OK…like I said, the affiliate program wasn’t available in my state last time I was in the position to want to use it. Also, I don’t necessarily want to be all Amazon all the time. Choice is good.

  • http://www.the-digital-reader.com/ Nate the great

    “It seemed to me that the one chance to restrain their growth — and every publisher and bookseller that is not Amazon would like to do that — was for Google to get serious about promoting and selling print as well as ebooks. But that won’t happen. Google is a digital company and they’re interested in doing all they can with digital media. They don’t want to deal with physical, even — as I suggested — doing it by having Ingram do the heavy lifting.”

    Google already pushes print book sales through Google Books. They direct you elsewhere rather than handling the sale themselves, so it’s only halfway to what you want, but Google is not and never was a retailer so they were never going to go further.

    And I have to disagree with your phrasing of Google’s interest in digital media. Google’s interest in digital content stems from its interest in supporting the Android platform. Content runs a distant second to Android, and so paper books aren’t even in the same field.

    Suggesting that Google, which gets most of its money from adverts, should get into retailing paper books tells me that you don’t understand Google at all. You saw them as a solution to your problem, but you failed to put yourself in their position and explain why they would be interested in solving said problem.

    • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

      Right. I saw them as a “solution to my problem” Our problem. And I tried to talk them into it based on some benefits I saw for them, including driving more of the original book search to them rather than to Amazon. I don’t have trouble accepting that it doesn’t fit their ambitions or their paradigm. But I made the appeal to them based on some internal Google support; it wasn’t just my private fantasy. We don’t just limit our efforts to slam dunks, or even to better than 50-50 propositions. Do you?

  • http://www.the-digital-reader.com/ Nate the great

    And as for the possibility of a crowd-sourced retailer out-competing Amazon, that isn’t going to happen.

    It depends on a bunch of companies each being better at their jobs than Amazon. That is possible, but as you said Amazon buys their stronger competitors before they become real threats.

    And there’s also the money problem. Readmill could have been the center of an Amazon competitor network, but they sold out because they couldn’t make any money at it.

    So no, this idea, as a way to compete with Amazon, is just unworkable.

    • Peter Turner

      I think, Nate, you’re overstating the remoteness of a viable *option* to Amazon for book purchasing. What would “being better than Amazon” look like? It’s not lowest price, ease of ordering, or speed of delivery. There’s no way to compete with Amazon on that basis. It’s a question of what the potentiel consumer might consider “better”–a different set of value propositions.

    • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

      Nate, with all due respect, I don’t think you get it. It isn’t “a crowd-based retailer”. It is a crowd of retailers. And they’re not doing it to beat Amazon. They’re doing it for myriad reasons, and getting sales is only one of them. And I am totally respectful of the strength of Amazon’s position. I don’t suggest “this will topple them”. It is more like “this MIGHT chip away at them”.

  • philipturner

    I blog frequently about books on two websites of my own, and have long lacked a good way to sell to my readers and visitors the books I write about. About 4 years ago, deciding that I wanted to link up with an affiliate bookseller, but declining to go with Amazon, I began working with Powell’s. I got from them a way to make links that pertained to each book i wrote about, and a visitor on my site could then click and buy a print copy of that book off Powell’s site, with a percentage of the sale returned to me. When I signed up with them, I naturally asked about ebook purchases, too, but was told print copies were then the only option. I asked if they were working on an ebook option for down the road, but the message was: ‘Don’t hold your breath.’ I realize now that Aer.io may’ve had options for me earlier, but at any rate am grateful the new integration with Ingram has brought their platform to my attention, confirmed by this analysis. As a retail bookseller before I was an editor and blogger, with a career-long penchant for sharing my enthusiasms, I’m eager to learn about all the options, and from an industry perspective, I anticipate significant interest from bloggers like me.

    • http://idealog.com/blog Mike Shatzkin

      Interesting to hear this. Of course, in your case, as an bookseller with literally years of experience, you might really be able to build this out into something. I don’t have any specific ideas or suggestions, but I imagine that as you start to play with the capabilities you will find opportunities to do more and more. It could be synergistic. You bring an audience of whatever number through your content, but as they interact with what you curate, it creates reasons for them to tell others, some of whom will also want the content. If you can get some momentum, it could be a virtuous circle.