The Shatzkin Files


Looking at the iPad from an ebook reader’s perspective


Here’s a quick review of the iPad. I’ve had it for a few days now and, based on what I know so far, it isn’t going to be a very important part of my life. It has great capabilities, but it has real limitations. The capsule summary is “not as good for straight text ereading as a Kindle; fabulous for visual stuff like movies and pictures and games (which I don’t play) but limited there by not supporting Flash.”

So far, I’ve watched a movie (using the Netflix app here might be the biggest payoff here for me with it, but I’m usually not big on movies out of theaters), gotten books from three platforms (Kindle, Kobo, and, of course, the iBook store), grabbed the Elements book-app (cool…). I also got a Vook (Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde), which was enough for me to see “not my cup of tea.” Maybe others on other subjects will be different…better. This one was both just not appealing (a clip introducing John Barrymore embedded in the first page of the story) and defective (a bunch of links that don’t work.)

The keyboard is miles better than one on a phone, but nowhere near as good as one on a laptop or netbook. So it isn’t a substitute for carrying a full-function computer on a trip, regardless of what software they eventually build for it. And if you’re going to carry another keyboard, what have you gained over carrying a netbook?

I bought it because I needed to see it and, to tell the truth, I thought it would be cool to carry it around the London Book Fair next week and show it to a lot of people in publishing who had not seen it yet. But the damn thing weighs a pound-and-a-half and doesn’t fit in any pockets (the Kindle fits in the hip pocket of most sports jackets which, frankly, I wear regularly for the pockets!) and I’m not slinging a briefcase on my shoulder to have the iPad when the iPhone keeps me adequately connected in a conference or trade show situation. It’s worth putting in my suitcase to show friends in some situations, but it won’t be with me most of the time.

There was some fun I could have on a computer or an iPhone that was definitely better with the iPad: using the YouTube app, punching in the names of old rock stars, and watching clips. (The sound from the iPad speakers is more than passable.) And being able to show photographs on the big iPad screen will be a great benefit for some people.

But as a straight ereading device, it just doesn’t cut it for me. The extra weight (over a Kindle or an iPhone) just isn’t sufficient compensation for the extra screen capability. It isn’t as good as the iPhone for reading in bed in the dark because the much more light it throws off makes it harder to avoid annoying your significant other. It took me a while to find it, but the lock that allows you to lie on your side and have the type lie in its side with you is managed by a button on the device itself, not a setting in the ereader platform, which is how Kindle and Kobo do it on the iPhone.

And Apple has not mastered the shopping experience for books yet. The iBook store shows far too few books per category. You see “new in fiction” and you ask for “all” and you get 23 titles? Give me a break! Or you go to “history” and see “recent releases” and you ask for “all” and see 18 titles? It looks great, but this is not using the unlimited bookshelf of the web to anything near its potential.

When you search for “baseball” in the iBook store, it doesn’t tell you how many results you get, but the answer is 117, strikingly similar to Kobo.

Kobo’s shopping experience is similar. When you search for a topic (I chose “baseball”). you are told how many results are being returned to you (I got 114.) While shopping for Kindle titles requires you to go “out of app” to their store on the web, that’s not really a problem (you can hardly tell the difference.) Of course, Amazon is the champion of choice – their killer app — and there are 946 search results for baseball. That suggests to me that both Kobo and iBooks have a long way to go to catch up to Kindle’s selection of titles. That means the advantage remains with Amazon for the foreseeable future.

I had a chat today with a collaborator who is more tech-savvy than I. He said he’s hearing the “too heavy for an ereader” comment from a lot of people. He theorized that perhaps some people might get an iPad instead of a computer if all they needed a computer for was web-surfing and emailing. But he admitted a netbook might be a smarter purchase in that situation for a lot of people.

Certainly, this device is not going to put the Kindle out of business and I doubt it will be the preferred ereader for any heavy consumer of books, or what books are today.

But the good news for publishers is that Apple will sell a lot of them as “content machines”: to people who aren’t primarily book readers. We might pick up some new ebook readers from the large universe of people who hardly read books now as a result. That would expand the market to our benefit.

On the other hand, anybody interpreting the announced 750,000 ebook “downloads” (not “purchases”) to 600,000 iPad purchasers in the first weekend as promising for publishers would need more data to come to that conclusion. That number by itself isn’t impressive, but we don’t know how many Kindle or Kobo (or other) books were downloaded by new iPad owners. Only Amazon knows for sure, but I’ll bet that 600,000 Kindle owners download three times that many book files in the first 24-48 hours they have their devices and it would be a bit of an upset (to me) if initial iPad activity were heavier with non-iBook content than with books purchased directly from Apple.

So the hunch from here is that the iPad will help us grow the ebook market but the makers of lighter and cheaper e-ink devices don’t have to leave the field just yet.

I thought Kassia’s take on this was useful as well. She explores the Ibis Reader which I didn’t (it sells little or no “branded” content so it is of less interest to me.) We mostly seem to agree about the iPad and ereading except that because she’s a woman,  she’s thinking this will encourage men to carry some form of handbag. Good luck with that one…

  Back to blog

  • http://www.directebooks.com/ Gareth Cuddy

    Some good points Mike.
    I think you're right – the really avid readers that are so vital to stores and publishers are going to ultimately favour the smaller, more portable devices which they can fit into their lives rather than the other way around. I would also agree that we may see many more “incidental” eBook purchases which is good for unit sales, but is not seismic in impact.
    Where I see the potential in iPad is for innovative, rich childrens books and educational material. Some publishers are beginning to explore this, but giving your content to a 3rd party app developer for a paltry 20% of net sales is not the way to go. I wish more publishers would take a leap of faith within their own product and produce great material they believe in and that consumers will appreciate and want.

    See you next week at LBF!

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Agreed, Gareth. If it isn't straight text ebook reading, the device has far
      more importance and value.

      Mike

  • http://www.bradleyrobb.net/ P. Bradley Robb

    Regarding the 700,000 eBook downloads, I wonder how many of them are Winnie the Pooh.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Good point. But I was really glad to get mine!

      Mike

    • Frank

      they clarified in the announcement that the Winnie the Pooh downloads were not part of that count.

      • http://www.bradleyrobb.net/ P. Bradley Robb

        Sweet, do you have a link for that?

  • Pingback: Looking at the iPad from an ebook reader’s perspective – Shatzkin Files

  • http://tizra.com/ Abe Dane

    I confess I haven't quite solved fashion issues around the man purse either, but I do see the iPad bringing web reading in particular into more and more corners of our lives where the hardware options have been limiting. While there's been a lot of focus on walled garden Apps, I think it's striking how good the web browsing experience is. As with the iPhone, the multi-touch zoom and scroll really counteract the blinker effect of the small screen. The iPad's addition of a few more pixels and a faster processor that palpably improves response to the touchscreen, gets us all the way past the “hey, I'm reading on a handheld” feeling of novelty to a web reading experience that truly raises questions about the need for anything with a less convenient form factor. When the 3G comes out, I think we'll be all the way there…and web based ebooks will be a lot more booklike.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      If it's “just a book” (narrative text), the features of the iPad are much
      more than is required and the weight, size, and price make it an excessive
      choice. In this one man's opinion…

      Mike

      • http://tizra.com/ Abe Dane

        True…I'm looking past 1.0 to cheaper, lighter versions I assume are on the way. I think you have to with a device that's trying to create a new category. Remember how cranky us earlier adopters were at the iPhone price cut so soon after launch?

        And of course my perspective is affected by the fact many of the books we deal with aren't just text…preservation of figures, pagination and layouts being key, particularly for professional technical, etc.

      • /blog Mike Shatzkin

        Agreed on both counts. When you move past straight narrative reading, the
        iPad has a lot to offer over Kindle or any e-ink device. And if they made it
        a bit smaller (so it would fit in the hip pocket of a sports jacket) and
        somewhat cheaper, I would see it as much more desirable.

        Mike

  • ty111

    Kindle, iPad, paperback, Gideon Bible–I don't care. But please, God, no handbags for men!

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      And although she didn't say it, I happen to know that was a *woman* talking.
      Take that, Kassia! Thanks, Tracy.

      Mike

  • Golly

    I think the sales of content from iBook store were far lower than reported figures.

    In total during the first week I think perhaps there will have been between 120,000 – 160,000 eBooks sold through iBook store.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Golly, are you basing this on any data, or can you at least shed some light
      on the reasoning behind your hunch?

      Mike

      • Golly

        This is based on some data that should give an accurate picture.

  • geneschwartz

    Enormously useful review, Michael. Fascinating to contrast with Dominique Raccah's comment that it has yet to leave her side and will probably replace her laptop. My thought is that for women who always carry a handbag or backtop already freighted with ballast, the weight factor will not be an issue. I use my jacket as a carry-all as well and can see how that would be a consideration.

    Gene

    Gene

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      *Absolutely* different for women than for men! If I carried a purse, I might
      consider the iPad a substitute for a laptop at certain times as well.

      Mike

      • davidnussbaum

        As always, Mike, fascinating review. I got my iPad right after opening weekend and have become a big fan. The weight issue is not a problem for me, and neither is the size, as it fits neatly into my backpack. I love the reading experience as I prefer backlighting, and do like the book simulation of turning pages.

        Also, the ability to discover new applications is relatively easy through a variety of lists and ultimately, I believe once more books are loaded (hundreds of thousands in the pipeline), that “shopping experience” will also be enhanced.

        Finally, keep in mind, that this is version 1.0. The early ipod and iphone devices also had “issues,” and the itunes store is revamped it seems like every other day and each version is much better than the previous.

      • /blog Mike Shatzkin

        A man with a backpack as a regular attachment would take a different
        position than I did.

        I think the device will do very well, overall. But I think a) it will not
        kill the Kindle (or e-ink) and b) if they make a smaller hip-pocket size
        version, it will do better still.

        Mike

  • Pingback: Contrasting two reviews regarding rumored death of the Kindle « Kindle Review – Kindle 3 Review, iPad Review

  • Pingback: When Will Ebooks Be Humanized?

  • 阿彌陀佛

    阿彌陀佛 無相佈施

    不要吃五辛(葷菜,在古代宗教指的是一些食用後會影響性情、慾望的植
    物,主要有五種葷菜,合稱五葷,佛家與道家所指有異。

    近代則訛稱含有動物性成分的餐飲食物為「葷菜」,事實上這在古代是稱
    之為腥。所謂「葷腥」即這兩類的合稱。 葷菜
    維基百科,自由的百科全書
    (重定向自五辛) 佛家五葷

    在佛家另稱為五辛,五種辛味之菜。根據《楞嚴經》記載,佛家五葷為大
    蒜、小蒜、興渠、慈蔥、茖蔥;五葷生啖增恚,使人易怒;熟食發淫,令
    人多慾。[1]

    《本草備要》註解云:「慈蔥,冬蔥也;茖蔥,山蔥也;興渠,西域菜,云
    即中國之荽。」

    興渠另說為洋蔥。) 肉 蛋 奶?!

    念楞嚴經 *∞窮盡相關 消去無關 證據 時效 念阿彌陀佛往生西方極樂世界

    我想製造自己的行為反作用力
    不婚 不生子女 生生世世不當老師

    log 二0.3010 三0.47710.48 五0.6990 七0.8451 .85
    root 二1.414 1.41 三1.732 1.73五 2.236 2.24七 2.646
    =>十3.16 π∈Q' 一點八1.34

  • richardjam

    I definitely agree with the comment about the current vooks that are available. The Sherlock Holmes one wasn't any better. However, can you imagine what a really innovative author could do with this platform? I'm thinking of a David Foster Wallace-type, or “House of Leaves”. More of my take here: http://library.blogs.delaware.gov/2010/04/14/ip

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Applied creativity always helps. But there will still be a value equation:
      the time it takes, the cost of the time, the size of the audience for a new
      and unproven form, and their willingness to pay. We'll see how all that adds
      up over time.

      Mike

  • michaelmhughes

    Interesting commentary, as always, but as usual, I disagree with a good bit of it :-)

    Most of the men I know carry some sort of bag or backpack or briefcase, and I suspect the peripheral/bag makers will come up with all sorts of “manly” carriers for those who don't. I'd rather carry an iPad in a bag than a Kindle in my jacket pocket (especially since I rarely wear a jacket).

    I do think more people will be converted to e-reading by the iPad. And the logic of buying a Kindle which does one thing (albeit “better” than the iPad for some people) versus buying an iPad (which does a bazillion things) will not make sense for most consumers and readers.

    Again, time will tell. But as others have pointed out, this is 1.0 and has only been out for a couple of weeks, and look at the impact it's having on the publishing industry. The Kindle, as I've said before, looks like something from a bad 70s sci-fi TV show, while the iPad looks and works like something contemporary… even futuristic. Consumers will vote with their wallets, and Apple will come out on top. I think we'll see that by the end of the summer.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Apple will probably do fine. But I don't think this will blow away dedicated
      ereaders (Kindle and many others) which will be cheaper, lighter, smaller
      and in some ways better for straight narrative reading. That's really my
      point. Maybe we don't really disagree, except in emphasis.

      Mike

  • desgreene

    The ebook content of the iPad was enhanced by Smashwords making its thousands of books available to iBookstore.

    The indie publishing revolution may see the iPad as another major step on the road to freedom from the clutches of traditional publishing houses.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      The Smashwords titles are already available thru B&N and Kindle, I believe.
      They're doing a great job of creating distribution through all possible
      channels. But I don't believe *every* Smashwords title gets all the
      distribution. There's a “premium catalog”, or something like that, which
      requires the owner of the title to provide some additional metadata and
      perhaps some quality control. I don't know the rules, but I'm pretty sure
      there's a bifurcation.

      Mike

  • desgreene

    Yes, there is indeed a premium catalog status required for Smashwords onward distribution. Attaining this status while exacting is not too difficult.

  • Pingback: Yeah, I Carry My iPad in a Purse? Wanna Make Something Out of It? | Publishing In the 21st Century

  • http://ebookreadercenter.com Daniel

    The iPad really isn't for ebooks (if you ask me). Great for games, video, surfing, email and a few other things though.

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Daniel, you and I agree, but I sure know a lot of people who think the iPad
      is *great* for books!

      Mike

  • http://Eclecticadvisor.com Robert Seth

    http://eclecticadvisor.com
    This is an excellent take on the IPad. Many people will be looking at this device and considering for an ereader (myself included). I am the type mentioned in this article…not an avid book reader. However, I read lots of technical books and I think this would be excellent for that. I'm not sure I want to try and carry it around with me though.

    Robert Seth

    • /blog Mike Shatzkin

      Thanks for the comment, Robert. Since I wrote this post, though, it has been

      established that a lot of people *will* carry the iPad around because it is

      a substitute for a computer, not just for an ereader. However, it *all *you

      wanted it for was to read books, you'd be much happier carrying around a

      Kindle or a Nook.

      Mike

      • http://Eclecticadvisor.com Robert Seth

        http://EclecticAdvisor.com

        Hello again Mike,
        I have since purchased the iPad 3G, 64GB and I love it…and I do carry it around. Even though I bought it primarily as an e-reader I now use it for everything. It has made my laptop a little superfluous for carrying around. With the calendar, notes, email, dictionary, calculator, GPS and incredible maps, music player, games, other apps, and of course, the ability to read books, I feel like I have my whole life on it. It's kind of like my new extended brain. I don't know how I ever got along without it.

        By the way, I tried the Nook Color and found it disappointing. I'm too much of a geek to be satisfied with something so limited in terms of funcionality. It was also too small for anything besides reading books. Magazines for example, while bright and colorful, were too small to enjoy.

        I hope your other readers find this revision to my original post helpful.

        Robert Seth

      • /blog Mike Shatzkin

        Thanks for checking in with this information, Robert.

        There are a large number of people I know who find the iPad the Master

        Substitute Device for everything from ereader to laptop. I think that makes

        a lot of sense.

        For me, personally, the iPhone is the Master Substitute Device for many

        things and I need the laptop for many other things. The iPad is too big to

        carry everywhere I carry the phone and too heavy for me as a dedicated

        ereader. I think there are lots of people who see it like I do too.

        Makes sense that this is a personal decision but I think you and I each

        represent a large number of other consumers.

        Mike