How many more times for BEA?


I went to my first ABA (American Booksellers Association) Convention in Washington, DC in 1970. I had just written “The View from Section 111″ for Prentice-Hall, about the New York Knicks’ first championship season, which was going to be published that October. Prentice-Hall threw a party for authors with a book coming that Fall, and among the others the only name I knew was Senator Barry Goldwater.

I started to attend regularly beginning with the 1973 ABA in Los Angeles. Since then I think I’ve missed one, so this year would make number 37, including that first one at the Shoreham.

The ABA at the Shoreham was in the basement of a not terribly huge hotel. It was probably a bit bigger than this, but it felt like it was about the size as the exhibition at Book Business Conference & Expo at the Marriott was this year. The 1973 show in Los Angeles was bigger, indicating, I think, that there was growth the Shoreham wasn’t large enough to handle, because the ABA had been at the Shoreham for many years. After that it bounced around: frequently at McCormick Place in Chicago, split between two hotels in New York (before Javits existed) in 1975, San Francisco when they opened Moscone in the late 1970s. 

When I was a pup, the ABA was definitely an order-writing show. The number of independent bookstores who bought a big chunk of any trade list properly presented to them was in the thousands. (Now: what would you say? the dozens? wouldn’t hundreds be an exaggeration?) Only a few of the biggest publishers had sales forces large enough and disciplined enough to really cover them all, so most exhibitors encountered retailers who would do immediate business. Everybody had some sort of show “special” to encourage ordering. I think for many years it was “blue badges” that signified booksellers: you kept an eagle-eye out for them as the traffic streamed by and you knew exactly what and how you were going to pitch them.

Each night at the main convention hotels, several publishers — and all the mass-market publishers — ran “hospitality suites” offering liquid refreshment and munchies very deep into the evening. You’d make the rounds of those after you had gone to whatever events, dinners, and parties had taken place in other locations. I always found the time in the hospitality suites to be a highlight of the convention.

The show floor for many years was open all day Saturday, Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday morning. Friday was set-up day. On Tuesday night was the ABA banquet, and people stayed and went to it!  Those who know me that banquets aren’t my cup of tea, but for some reason I was at the one at the San Francisco ABA in 77 or 78. I remember it well because I was seated at a table with Jill Krementz, the noted photographer and wife of Kurt Vonnegut.

Roysce Smith was the longtime Executive Director of the ABA and he was the Major Domo of the burgeoning convention. Toward the end of his career Roysce’s legs couldn’t carry his large-ish body around the growing acreage of convention floor, so he cruised the aisles in a motorized vehicle.

Daisy Maryles was one of PW’s key reporters then. Daisy didn’t work from sundown Friday to sundown Saturday, so she really worked the hall on Friday while people were setting up. In those days, of a smaller industry and smaller companies and the ABA being a very important annual event, the executive team (maybe the CEO, certainly the sales execs) was in the hall in blue jeans on set-up day making sure everything was shipshape. So Daisy actually got much more bandwidth and information by working the hall on Friday than she would on Saturday, when the publishers’ attention turned to the booksellers.

The Walden and Dalton chains grew fast in the 1970s and 1980s, but the independents continued to thrive as well. So the ABA Convention continued to just grow and grow. I remember there was a point when there were only a handful of places in the country that could host it because the convention hall acreage required was so great.

Then in the 1990s, new ABA Director Bernie Rath, who had replaced Roysce when he retired. sold the show to Reed Exhibitions. First Bernie sold Reed 49% of the show in 1992 and then the additional 2% that gave Reed control of the show in 1996. After that, its name changed to BookExpo America.

Although “education” had become part of the show during the ABA’s tenure, Reed set out to expand that aspect of things and to make the show bigger and better. But their timing was terribly unfortunate. The long expansion of the US book trade, which had continued pretty much unabated from World War II until the mid-1990s, stopped and started to reverse in the internet age. Even worse for the industry trade show, consolidation of both big publishers and retailers accelerated. That meant fewer publisher customers to buy the booth space, and fewer retailers walking the aisles to make the booth space valuable.

Last year’s convention in Los Angeles was the first where it really felt slower and sparser. At the time, BEA was scheduled to go to Las Vegas in 2010 and it seemed to me that, if they did, it would be the last convention. Things had evolved to the point where publishers were paying good money for booth space to be sitting targets for consultants and new tech propositions to put forth their propositions. How long, I wondered, would publishers pay good money to make prospecting for work efficient for me and others like me?

The BEA got the same message. It has been announced that the show is in New York from now on. That makes sense in that the publishers who pay the most for booth space can now, at least, avoid the great expense of flying New York staff somewhere else in the country and putting them up. That forestalls Armageddon, but it can’t be permanently avoided. New plans have been announced to make the trade show run mid-week, rather than across the weekend. That anticipates what will be this year’s embarrassment, which is that hardly anybody will be there on Sunday.

The BEA of today isn’t the ABA of old. The booksellers are just about gone. The late-night hospitality suites don’t exist anymore. And hardly any publisher goes to the show expecting to write orders. It is time to organize a betting pool where the question is: how many more BEAs before, like its Canadian counterpart, it simply ceases? Three? Four? Hard to see more than that.


  Back to blog

  • Michael S. Hyatt
    I'm the CEO of Thomas Nelson. We haven't exhibited at BEA now for two years. Honestly, we don't feel we missed a thing—except the time and expense of attending. There are far more cost-effective ways to engage with our customers than trade shows. The sooner the industry realizes this, the more quickly it can deploy its limited resources to sell more books.
  • Michael, thanks for your comment. What you did not say (but I will say for you) is that I saw a couple of very smart people from Thomas Nelson prowling the hall last week. So, when you say you didn't miss a thing, that's an informed opinion, not an ostrich one. This demonstrates a larger point. It isn't hard to get great value out of the show if you don't have to pay for the investment of having a booth and a lot of staff. The problem is, without lots of publishers doing that, there is no show!
  • Andrew Porter
    My first ABA was 1975, then I went every year until late in the 1990s; published an annual guide to the thing with the help of Daisy Maryles and others at PW, for my readers — I edited/published Science Fiction Chronicle from 1979 to 2002 — and at first there was a vast amount of SF/fantasy/horror content, with lots of genre authors at ABA, then gradually less and less. My Guide went from several pages of small type to a single page of large type until I stopped doing it. I too remember the incredible parties, like the one at Hugh Hefner's in LA (and the earlier ones at the Playboy Mansion in Chicago), the riverboat in New Orleans, the party for "The Name of the Rose" at the Italian Embassador's house in DC, the press outings to see original movies (Alien, Goonies, the various Star Wars films, etc.), the Rock Bottom Remainders.

    Those days in publishing are gone, the companies are mere shadows of themselves, now imprints for foreign publishers or worse, merged together in unlikely combinations, the powerhouses like Ian and Betty Ballantine, Ron Busch, gone, dead or retired. As am I. The center cannot hold... (Where have I heard that before?)

    It's been an interesting many decades, but it's apparently mostly over.
  • Bruce Harris
    Mike,
    What a great piece.
    I'm wallowing in nostalgia.
    My first ABA convention was in 1963
    Remember how hot it was in the garage of the Shoreham with all those people and the low ceilings and the humid Washington heat?? I used to have to change shirts 3 times a day.
    Lots of great memories and to your point about order writing I especially remember Lyle Stewart building a booth with silver Chivas Regal bottles and advertising that if buyers left a $100 order they could take the bottle back to their room then and there.
    Back then we had a business based on relationships that became deeper every year. Now with most Americans changing jobs 10 times before they are 40, relationships are wider but much less deep. Social networking on Twitter and Facebook is important and interesting but doesn't take the place of face to face communication.
    Back then you could make a book at ABA. Crown did it several times most notably with Clan of The Cave Bear a first novel by an unknown author. But now the visual cacaphony won't allow focus and everyone wants to sell everything which eventually leaves people wondering "What's the big book?"
    My 45 year old son told me 15 years ago "Dad your generation had the best of the world and it's not going to be that good for us"
    I protested that every parent wants to see their children have an even better life but I now think he might have been right.
    Certainly in the publishing world we had a lot of fun, a quality that seems to be evaporating from this business at an alarming rate.
    So if you see me on the floor let's have some laughs and maybe I'll even order a book from you if we can find an order form and a pencil.
  • Bruce, you're not the negotiator you used to be! You've already agreed to order from me without even asking what my show discount will be. OK, done deal. And I won't even check your credit!

    I think we did live in incredible times. Your son is very perceptive and knows his history. As I told a bunch of kids at Columbia 17 years ago when I was campaigning there for Clinton: "You kids are in college in the age of AIDS. I was in college when the birth control pill was first invented. And those days are never coming back."

    Which could lead to some ABA stories that can't be told on a family blog.
  • Dear Mike:

    I hope your prediction does NOT come to pass. It would be a significant loss for the book businees. I joined Grosset & Dunlap in 1950 and my first job was to set up our stand in the basement of the Shoreham. And I have attended every Book Fair since. The BEA is a national treasure.
    It simply has become too expensive, but with some sensible frugality, some modest changes, it could and should survive. Why do I disagree -with due respect for your position and your "wake-the-up" contrarian
    talent?

    1. This is a Fair! In one place, at one time, when all the levels in the publishing industry display their books and introduce their authors that create the books. What a great event! The original concep that it was a place to write orders is and has been for many years inoperative because of retailer consolidation and the invention of the Internet. It is now the place where the largest number of the participants in the industry can meet, show off, discuss and learn from each other. The book will continue to be a source of entertainment and knowledge for as far as we can visualize. Let's continue to celebrate it!

    2. Agreed it has become too expensive. There is no reason for publishers to build hugely expensive stands. There is no need for thousands of copies of books to be given away. There is no need for competing parties. Over indulgence requires going on a diet not commitiing suicide. Being able to see all the industry in one place, negotiate for rights with publishers world wide, to meet with all the major customers in one venue, etc is a great value. And for those from out of town, a visit to New York City at convention rates just adds to the fun.

    3. Redefine the goals Given the fact that this is the kick-off for the biggest sales period and all the publishers are putting their best foot forward, one of major goals is the make this Fair a festival of the book with generous open hours for public attendance. Since the the digital revoltion is providing the delivery sytems for book content, we need to encourage all the companies involved in making this possible to participate. The goal of the Fair is to provide a meeting place for all the players involved. The BEA needs to expand its participation rather than disappear. It can be a major force growth if its vision is widened.

    Mike, if your prediction of an early death of the BEA should come true,
    in a very short period, it would be re-invented.

    Martin Levin

    (Disclosure: Our Firm represented the ABA in the initial sale to Reed and my opinion has not been influenced in any way. I was a publisher long before I became a lawyer. This is the publisher in me talking)
  • Martin, there's a lot to agree with in your piece. I find myself needing to say that I don't predict what I WANT to happen; I predict what I THINK will happen. I always have a blast at BEA for all the reasons you state. But I don't think your answer -- making it bigger -- will work.

    However, I agree completely with your conclusion. When the BEA dies, it will be re-invented. The Frankfurt in NY idea dreamed up by Cader and proposed by the two of us several years ago is too easy to miss. But I think the idea of a very large fair open to the public that commands the industry is a non-starter. There are already book fairs open to the public (LA has one; SF had one for years, perhaps they still do) but the industry doesn't attend en masse.

    It sure feels like I've been going to the convention for a long time but you have me beat by more than 20 years! You are a very hard guy to keep up with.
  • Robert Riger
    Cassandra, Cassandra. Remember when Tom McCormack dropped out?
  • Robert, I sure do. And, as I recall, at the time he was not alone!

    But I'd be happy to make a little side bet about BEA in 2012. If there is one, it won't resemble what we are going to this weekend.
  • Thanks for this wonderful, thoughtful piece. E.P. Dutton always had the best hospitality suite, where Frank Heidelberger and his wife Marie so graciously reigned. My biggest concern is for the indie booksellers here in Southern California (and, indeed, all over the country) and how they can possibly afford to attend BEA in NYC after this one. We haven't hit bottom yet. That being the case, I'll predict that the final BEA will be in 2010.
  • Wendy, booksellers all over the country lose because the show doesn't move anymore. Unfortunately, that's not a large number of people. Somebody made the point that BEA ought to be PAYING booksellers to come: flying them in! That's an idea that is directionally correct, but wouldn't solve the problem.

    Your prediction of one more BEA after this one seems to be the consensus of people coming back to me on this point.
  • Great post, Mike. Jack McKeown's right. Social media adopters are coming to BEA this year, many for the first time, excited and interested in becoming part of the book publishing community. While the old trade show model may no longer make fiscal sense, we need to find some way to keep the spirit of the show alive.

    The first ever BEA TweetUp is drawing an overflow crowd. Bloggers will be posting from the show floor. People are making appointments to meet one another at the show via their Facebook pages and LinkedIn. I find it heartening that all this social media energy bodes well for those with a passion for books.

    I'm disappointed to hear that BEA had difficulty with the relatively simple suggestion to capture speakers presentations for later use. BEA needs a YouTube channel, a CTO (Chief Twitter Officer) and a content rich Facebook Fan Page just for starters and a web tv show might not be a bad idea either. Without these they're missing opportunities to claim leadership in the discussion about the future of publishing. The buzz this year might well be about readjusting publishers marketing strategies to embrace social media's ability to speak directly to the consumer. Most publishers are behind the curve in embracing the opportunities represented by this new direct to consumer distribution channel.
  • Cindy, in many ways all the activity you point to through all the new channels and tools is precisely why the BEA's model is broken. They can't charge for tweets and blog posts. They charge for BOOTH SPACE. And the Original Reason to pay for booth space was to write orders! That's all gone. Serving as an organizing principle for 21st century book-interested people to communicate just doesn't have an obvious business model. Frankfurt has been trying diligently to create a virtual show parallel to the physical one for years. Maybe it can work for the show's main activity, rights-selling (although I don't think so...) but it certainly can't work for my Frankfurt activity, which is based on the face-to-face meetings I'm able to have with people from all over the world. (Yes, Facebook and LinkedIn help make that activity more efficient, but they're no substitutes for it.) If enough of the people I go to see stop going to Frankfurt, I'll stop too.

    I am uncomfortable blaming people who were executing old models for their "lack of vision" for not making the jump to the new. I can see why PW's model went away and Cader's operation and Mutter's newsletter show some things they could have done about it, but from their base, it was a lot harder to see. It's the old saw that the railroads didn't understand they were in the TRANSPORTATION business or they would have become airlines. I know trade publishers can only survive by becoming multi-vertical publishers, but they have to develop a new model while still working the old one to do that, and that's hard.

    When BEA dies, new things will happen. Maybe something like the show Cader (and I along with him) proposed several years ago as "Frankfurt in NY." Other things too. Some of them will succeed and make money. But that doesn't mean BEA could have just morphed into them.

    IF BEA's owners have the sense to trade what they've got for something smaller, or maybe even more than one thing smaller, they might be able to rescue part of the franchise. But the activity Jack and you see -- which I see too and am part of -- does not a business model make. Necessarily.
  • James
    Having the show in NYC is the killer. It's great for NYC based publishers, but horrible for the rest of the world, authors, consumers and trade professional around the country that now have to travel to one of the most congested and expensive convention venues on the planet. Go to Vegas. Vegas is hurting, so they'd get a better deal there and can lower costs across the board. Vegas has great access and cheaper hotels and airfare.

    Having the show permanently in NYC shows a bunker mentality that is looking inward not outward.
  • I used to go to two annual trade shows in Las Vegas. One of them required two hours of visiting exhibitors, and two days of travel. I stopped going.

    This year was the first time I went to BookExpo. I was on the train from CT to NYC for 90 minutes. My main purpose was to see the Espresso Book Machine in action. I was not disappointed.

    If BookExpo was in Vegas, I would not have gone.
  • Actually, James, I think if they put the show in Vegas, it would kill it permanently. Although BEA has a wide base, the participation of the NY publishers drives a lot of the other activity (all the foreign publishers who exhibit will be far less willing to do so if the Big Six aren't on the floor. And those booksellers who do come will be less likely to if the biggest trade publishers aren't there.) I don't minimize the degree to which NY is a burden for many: the city isn't cheap and Javits is less convenient than McCormick in Chicago or even the center in Los Angeles in many ways. And NY is expensive, as you point out. But, like it or not, the consumer book publishing business in the US is centered on this island and this is a case where they have to take the mountain to Muhammad. They have very little choice.
  • My first ABA was 1978, my last BEA 2004. The last ever, by the sound of things. This brings back cheerful memories (I even managed to have a good time in Atlanta) but sadness that one more way of life is passing on. For you are undoubtedly right; its days are numbered.
    But people will still need to congregate and communicate, have a frank and full discussion, share a fag or a fist fight. Frankfurt supplies that; did the ABA/BEA ever really deliver? When I first went there, touting for business, the icy responses were unanimous. "We're here to talk to bookstores. Nobody else. Go away."
    When a trade fair is based on one single premise, that premise had better be pretty permanent. Or else it's bye bye trade fair.
    So by bye BEA. Mike, you'll be proved right once again.
  • Gwyn, ironically it is the growth beyond the bookseller focus that is making things more difficult for BEA. The behavior you describe seems far more typical of 1978 than 2004, by which time the rights and non-bookseller world had grown enormously. But the overhead of the show -- the fancy booths -- is still about glitz for retailers. It isn't about the efficiency of Frankfurt or, to a lesser extent, London. I'm being told by smart people offline that the show will squeeze out another year or two, so maybe you'll get a chance to try it one more time before it dies.
  • Max Alexander
    Mike, interesting post, even for an ink-stained wretch like me who hasn't worn out his shoes at any trade shows since his Variety days. (And yes, for guys like me, the Cannes Film Fest was a tradeshow; there were no starlets on the floor of my hotel.) But like a great vaudevillian, you left me wanting more: namely, what did you and Goldwater have to talk about back in 1970 (if indeed you had a conversation)? I know your politics are so closely aligned to his!
  • Max, how did they manage to keep the starlets OFF the floor of your hotel? Armed gendarmes, no doubt.

    If only there were a story about Barry and me, I'd tell it. We shook hands. There was no political discourse at all. Sorry to disappoint.
  • Max Alexander
    Starlets would not have been able to find my hotel.
  • Mike:

    When viewed through a traditional lens that you so deftly point above, then the Show is all but dead. Tough to dispute that. But there may, I emphasize may, be a refreshing under-current of enthusiasm among a new generation of attendees. You here it in the blogs, on Twitter and other social networking sites. Many of these voices are coming to BEA for the first time. These folks may not be the movers and shakers of the product-centric publishing community that we know, but they are bookish people in their own right and their excitement about the future of their niche portions of the business, whether it be as indie bookseller staff or new-fangled indie publishers, is palpable. I am attending this year precisely to take some measure of this self-generating publishing tribe.

    My one suggestion to the Show proper is to create its own avatar, a virtual BEA that would run simultaneous with the physical convention. Publishers could host virtual boths, staffed by real time sales staff on-line to field retailer queries, book author appearances, etc. Live-feeds from the Show's author events could ad a further dimenstion of entertainment and involvement. I think the level of engagement for the entire publishing community would be maginified many fold, particularly among junior bookstore staff (chain and indie), editoral and marketing assistants, agents and writers, etc.--the future of the industry. If handled correctly, the virtual BEA could become a real money maker for Reed, through an expanded universe of fee-paying virtual attendees and exhibitors, far offsetting any potential cannibalization of Javitz-based revenues. What have they got to lose at this point?
  • Jack, it is hard to quarrel with your idea. But I am not sure an exhibition company is the best entity to do it. The kind of effort you are suggested doesn't need to be connected to a physical show. I made the suggestion last year that the very fine BEA program of panels and speeches be captured and distributed more broadly throughout the year. Even that is a bit too much for an organizations whose expertise is to put together large physical shows (no mean feat, by the way.) You're right that the digerati seem to be descending on the show in far greater numbers this year.
  • I guess I'm going to my first BEA just in time. I've wanted to go for years, ever since reading MURDER AT THE ABA by Asimov. I'm sorry to have missed the glory days, but looking forward to it just the same.
  • Toni, you'll have fun. It's still a great gathering. Just harder to justify financially than it used to be!
  • Great post. I went to my first ABA in 1993 working for Ingram and have probably been a dozen times or so. Your description is spot on. It seems like it would make sense for it to merge with another, broader show that is more technology/media oriented - probably with pubs largely as attendees, perhaps presenters, but not exhibitors. I've often wondered why it does continue. Someone told me that "rights" were the big business being done and I know nothing about that.

    (But can we keep the PGW party? Ok, I'll keep my memories at least.)
  • Mark, some rights business gets done, no doubt. But rights shows don't need all the marketing cost that is entailed by BEA. Rights shows (which Frankfurt and London really are) have stands that are set up for people to have 2-, 3-, and 4-person meetings. The people really working at those shows have appointments scheduled for most half-hour time slots. BEA isn't set up that way and doesn't work that way.

    A few years ago, Michael Cader and I proposed a rights-only show to be called Frankfurt in NY. It could take place in a large hotel ballroom. It would just be a centralized place where publishers, agents, and packagers could rendezvous and see several different people within a compressed period of time. But an idea like that could come back to life if the BEA actually died. Of course, a show like that would attract no booksellers, no authors,and very little pres. It's a completely different idea.
  • Don Linn
    Barring something extraordinary, my money's on 2009's being the last BEA, at least in anything resembling its current format. Publishers simply can't justify the expense.
  • Don, you could well be right. There is no doubt that all trade shows are under pressure (our survey for Making Information Pay made that very clear.) Of the Big Three (London, Frankfurt, BEA) I think BEA makes the least commercial sense and, travel costs aside, it is the most expensive show at which to exhibit. I think they'll squeeze out another year or three, but I wouldn't put any large amount of money down against your prediction.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Go Back | Top