Why Dad’s book had a disclaimer from the publisher


Only a short post on a rainy Sunday, a little folksier than usual. But I did think of something sort-of analytical at the end.

But when I write about my Dad, nice things happen. Last week I got this link sent to me by a friend in London, reminding me of the disclaimer in In Cold Type. Dad was actually pretty proud of it. I also got a call from a retired CEO who encountered him early in his career and was permanently influenced. And next week I’m having coffee with a literary agent  who started her career working with a dose of his mentoring at Doubleday in the 1950s.

Dad’s book is a tour de force. Nobody ever thought more analytically about every single process in trade publishing or brought such a comfort level with technology to their thinking.  He should have gotten more attention for correctly predicting the inevitable decline of mass market publishing at a moment when few saw it: very shortly after what remains the biggest paperback deal in history. (That was Princess Daisy by Judith Krantz, from Crown to Bantam Books, for $3.1 million, in 1979.)

It was a real struggle for Dad to get the book published. Although, as Dad pitched it, this was a book for everybody in book publishing and anybody interested in book publishing, that could only be true in the Cliff’s Notes version. Indeed, this is a book only for people with a deep interest in publishing. But time has proven that, for those, it is compelling.

David Replogle was the head of Houghton Mifflin’s trade department in the early 1980s and he had worked for Dad at Doubleday in the 1950s. All of the big houses had turned the book down. Was it because it wouldn’t sell well enough? Maybe. Was it because they didn’t want their authors and agents and shareholders asking them whether they did things the Len Shatzkin way, which they usually didn’t…? (What were those? Standardized trim sizes and text designs, much larger sales forces, statistically-driven print and pricing decisions, publishing companies encouraging retailers to allow them to manage  inventory at the point of sale…) I believe the nuisance factor crossed more than a few minds. Anyhow, Replogle, in a decision that was X parts business and Y parts sentimental favor, signed the book.

It sold well enough in hardcover to warrant a trade paperback edition. And when it reverted, Dad was one of the first to sign up for Lightning Print, almost two decades after he wrote In Cold Type. New technology always did appeal to him.

Clicking on a few links that I hadn’t for a while for this post made me realize something new about The Long Tail. While Dad’s book is in Lightning, there’s hardly any reason for somebody to buy the POD version anymore. The combination of the ones we’ve sold over the past 10 or 12 years and the relentlessly-increasing efficiency of the online used book supply system means there are probably enough copies in circulation to require bulk demand — for, say, 25 or more copies — for it make sense to do anything but shop the net for used. This is happening book by book. It would mean that the valuable shelf life of many scans for POD purposes might be considerably shorter than forever and that some books probably sell their very last newly-printed copy every day. That’s a new thought to me.


  Back to blog

  • geneschwartz
    Sad but true - except for those few who prefer to buy new instead of used - also a dying breed.

    I am reminded of the movie The Man in the White Suit --- he was acclaimed to have invented a fabric that would never wear out, until the populace began to realize that factories were shutting down and people were being thrown out of work -- then. one day, one of the suits began to unravel.

    There has to be a black swan (or white suit) in all of this awaiting its moment of discovery out in the lake somewhere.

    Gene Schwartz

    PS Len's book remains among the classics in my library.
  • Thomas Adler
    Not only is the used book market for the sale of books but now there is trading is used books. It used to be that is there was a used copy of a book in a basement in Kansas there was no access to that book. Now the owner of the book may have it listed on Amazon or eBay. If not for sale the book may be traded at one of the used book swapping sites. Paperbackswap.com (PBS) lists on their front page that they have saved their members over 17 million dollars by swapping books instead of buying them. Clearly not ever book swap is a lost sale but some of them have to be. On the PBS website they have a list of the top 50 posted books. For example the first book on the list is "Angels and Demons" and there are over 2700 copies of the book listed on the site. There are over 60,000 copies of the top 50 books available on the site. See: http://www.paperbackswap.com/book/top_50.php#t=posted

    The site also listed the top 50 most requested books. The Memory Keepers Daughter has been exchanged over 5,000 times on PBS. The top 50 books on the site have been exchanged more than 100,000 times. See: http://www.paperbackswap.com/book/top_50.php#t=requested

    I find it odd that publishers are so worried about electronic copies of their books being pirated when at the same time there is a completely legal way to move print copies of their books without earning any money for the publisher or author.
  • I am inclined to agree with you that the shifting of used print books
    probably causes more sales loss for publishers than ebook piracy at this
    point. The problem in both cases is: what the hell can anybody *do* about
    it?

    There was an attempt by BISG to quanitify the used book problem about five
    years ago. For some reason, Amazon agreed to participate then in the data
    gathering. As I thought at the time, they reconsidered the sense of that
    from their point of view and haven't been willing to share data since.
    Without Amazon's used book data, there's not much point to analysis since
    one might assume that upwards of 75% of those sales go through them.

    Mike
blog comments powered by Disqus

Go Back | Top