White labeled specialty stores, not ebook superstores, are the future


One of the recurring characteristics of “change” is that the first iteration of something new looks a lot like what it is replacing. So it has been with ebooks and ebook retailing. The ebooks themselves have, for the most part, been the same as the print books except rendered on a screen instead of on paper. And when we say “the same”, we mean right down to duplicating meaningless blank pages and the legend often found in print books that tells you how many printings the book has had. (This still happens frequently; I’ve just experienced it on The Big Short which I’m now reading in B&N’s reader.)

And ebook retailing has also imitated print book retailing in that the emphasis has been on the assembling the largest possible aggregation of book title choices in one place. This is a paradigm that makes intuitive sense in the physical world; once I’ve driven to my local superstore, I don’t want to find the mysteries are here but the cookbooks are in a store down the block.

It has been a long-established “fact” (although I question if it is still true, as we’ll explain later) that the larger is the selection of books available in a single location, the more powerful is the magnet to attract customers. My father found this out when he was in charge of the Brentano’s chain in the 1960s. Their Short Hills, New Jersey store was the worse-performing store in the chain until they doubled its title selection. And then, like magic, it became the best-performing store in the chain.

Amazon dot com reproved the point when they went into business in the mid-1990s. Although they were not the first online bookstore, they were the first to really attempt to carry everything. In fact, they went beyond carrying everything by providing a database (obtained from Baker & Taylor, in which there is another story) that not only showed just about all the books in print but also books that were no longer in print! Conventional publishing and retailing theory at the time would have said it was a bad move to return suggestions in search results that were books not available for sale. But, of course, it built their competitive advantage. They rapidly became the best place to search because of the completeness of their database and, actually, confirming to a customer that “what you want is a book that was indeed published but is not now readily available” made it easier to sell the customer a substitute. Whereas the the store (online or off) that didn’t have the unavailable book but didn’t also provide that information found it harder to close the alternate sale.

The point about the importance of selection was proven again by Amazon when they launched the Kindle in November, 2007 and lit the fire for what is still a spreading conflagration of ebook reading. Before Kindle, there were perhaps 100,000 ebook titles available as PDFs that could be read on a full-function computer, but not nearly as many in formats that could work on smaller devices (Palm, Mobi, Dotlit). Amazon launched Kindle with about 150,000 titles and used their market power to get big publishers to put more and more of the newest, hottest books into their format closer and closer to publication date.

There were other features of the Kindle (the ability to load books wirelessly and instantly without going through an intermediary device; its easy-to-read e-ink; its built in dictionary; Amazon’s deep relationship with very large numbers of online book buyers; and, of course, eye-catching prices relative to the print edition prices of the hottest new books) that fueled its near instantaneous success, but the robust title selection was a critical element.

So to that point — one could say to this point — the largest possible selection in one place has been as important to the success of an ebook retailer (obviously: online) as it was historically to a print book retailer with a physical store.

Early in the decade, it occurred to me that the magnetic power of the large selection in one physical store had sharply diminished. When Dad doubled the inventory of the Short Hills Brentano’s, he delivered a selection that the consumer couldn’t match for many miles around. When Barnes & Noble and Borders got Wall Street money to replicate the Bookstop model of 100,000+ title superstores in the early 1990s, they were enabling consumers to find conveniently books which had previously been obtainable only with great effort. But the limitless shelf space of online bookselling undercut that advantage and by the early part of this decade, it seemed to me that the consumer was finding the unlimited availability of titles online which could be delivered in a day or two so powerful that the large selection in a store that might be available immediately had really diminished appeal.

But there’s another thread of bookselling history on- and offline that I believe will soon become the dominant paradigm for ebook retailing. And, of course (just so you are reminded what blog you’re reading), it fits into the concept of “verticality”.

Publishers have known for a long time that good deals can be made and large sales can be registered through what we call “specialty retailers”. (The label for these sales in a publishing house, and others such as sales to catalogers or premium sales, is “Special Sales.”) The store that sells the tools and materials to refinish your floors can sell you a book to explain how to do it. The store that sells computers and paper and ink can also effectively sell resume or how-to computer books. The garden supply store can sell books on how to make your roses bloom.

Amazon and other online merchants (and not just of books) have long operated “affiliate” programs by which a web site can earn a commission on sales made at the primary merchant by referring a customer. This generally works by having the affiliate site promote a particular book title; when the site visitor clicks on the link, s/he is delivered to Amazon or BN.com’s page for that title. If the customer buys, the referring site gets a commission. These revenues don’t often amount to big money for the referring sites (although they sometimes do), but it is believed (but as with All Things Amazon, we don’t have the critical data to confirm) that, cumulatively, referrals from perhaps millions of affiliates deliver significant volume and customers to Amazon (and others.)

This is as far as “special sales” have gone in the ebook world. But the guess from here is that this is about to change and that the change we’ll see in the next few years will obliterate the notion that “all subjects in one place” is a significant marketing advantage, online or in a store. Many book sales, and particularly ebook sales, will move to “contextual” resellers. Your accountant’s web site will sell you the book(s) that help you understand a new tax law or how to ready your business for sale. Your favorite sports web site will sell you the new biography of Alex Rodriguez. And your favorite “Literary Review” newsletter and website will take care of your needs to acquire fiction directly and without your having to shop the vaster stacks of an online superstore.

That is: curated ebook offerings (a click away from the ability to buy lots more content beyond the curated selection) will be featured on every web site with any significant traffic. Delivering purchaseable content — books right now, but ulimately magazines, shorter articles, and relevant audio- and video-content as well — will become a standard expectation of any site (or web community) that aspires to a true mutual embrace with its site visitors. “What I’ve read lately and liked, and why” is a legitimate offering to anticipate from every blogger or commentator with a following.

Last week, Barnes & Noble held its regular call to announce financial results and future expectations. In that call, B&N expressed the expectation that the ebook world would ultimately settle down to about five players and that they’d be one of them. With that perspective, they saw for themselves a reasonable proportion — say 20% — of the ebook market.

My first reaction to that was “what are they thinking? There won’t be five online booksellers; there will be five million.” A day or two later I had a conversation with one of my personal tech gurus who saw it the way B&N’s statement suggested they did  (”it will consolidate, just like the music business did…”) He also asked a lot of practical questions. On what devices will these ebooks be read? How will all these individual sites deal with the format issues, the DRM issues, the customer service? In other words, “great vision, Mike, but how can it possibly work?”

I think it will work like affiliate sites worked, but in a more sophisticated way. A strong central operator providing scale facilitates the commercial offering of the niche player. The harbinger of the future is the deal announced last week between F+W Media and Ingram Digital. Ingram is setting up all F+W specialist web sites (and they have them for many different vertical interest groups) with the ability to sell both ebooks and print of all publishers to their site traffic. (Although we have working relationships with both companies, we weren’t involved in that deal and don’t know any of the details.)

I believe that the Ingram-F+W deal is the start of something new and big. Both companies are going to find ways to improve on whatever is the starting point. F+W is going to have to learn how to merchandise what Ingram can give them into a unique shopping and content consumption experience for the consumer. And Ingram is going to have to learn how to deliver what they can offer to F+W in a way that enables F+W  to curate and enhance the selection to deliver something uniquely customized to its own community.

If that view of the future is right, the competition among the players who can provide the ebook selection and transaction services Ingram does — those in the game already like Amazon, B&N, iBooks, and Kobo and those saying they’re about to come in like Google, B&T’s Blio, and Copia — is going to take place in a whole new arena. B&N has announced deals like this, where they “power” somebody else’s bookstore. Kobo hasn’t yet, but I’d expect them to; it just seems to me like an opportunity they’d see. This is a bit odd; it puts “wholesaler” Ingram in competition with retailers to create the next round of niche retailers. Ingram obviously has the built-in capability to offer print and electronic book delivery but, of course, B&N has the internal resources to do that too, and  B&T can do it too. There are anomalies to rationalize about margin, but, in the end, customer acquisition through this strategy will be far cheaper than it is most other ways, even if a fixed margin from the publisher is shared with the niche player.

This business hasn’t really begun to happen yet; we’re just seeing the outlines of it. Initially, the competition appears to be about how each retailer delivers its vast set of content choices to the online consumer in a consolidated way. (And usually it has been the same for Ingram. Most of their business has come from large “sell everything” ebook stores.) But over time it will evolve into a competition for niche resellers. Winning is always about delivering the best consumer experience but the challenge will be to deliver the best consumer experience to somebody else’s consumers. White label is the key to the ebook (and book) retailing future.


  Back to blog

  • Cliff Landesman
    Regarding the legend on the copyright page indicating the print run: it is useful to record which printing provided the source file for the ebook.

    Hope you enjoyed The Big Short!

    Cliff Landesman
    Director of Electronic Media
    W. W. Norton & Co.
  • Thanks for the comment, Cliff, and while what you say is true, I don't
    really buy it. If that's the point, I'd suggest you replace the row of
    numbers with a line that says "the text for this ebook was taken from the
    first printing of The Big Short" which would have two great advantages: it
    would show me that you were paying attention to the ebook audience and it
    would be a lot clearer statement of what you are trying to communicate.

    And, since you were kind enought to comment, I should say that I think you
    guys did a great job (best I've seen so far) with the footnote navigation.
    Simple click on the asterisk to take you to the note and simple click on the
    asterisk in the note to take you back to the right place in the text.

    Mike
  • Hi Mike

    Thanks for the great articles and insight. I first started selling eBooks about 7 years ago and had the good timing of envisioning a world where eBooks became popular.
    As a result i bought well over 100 key niche specific tld eBook domain names such as sportsebooks.com and all the niche ebook names in india and australia with the belief that we would eventually move to these "niche" ebook stores. I have been biding my time in developing these sites while the big players fight it out over formats, reading devices and drm.
    I think when stores promote and compete on quantity of ebooks that they are actually harming themselves as customers will just get lost with all the categories and eBooks. It will come back to quality and the market will dictate which stores survive.
    I also started a tennis membership site about 6 years ago and have been selling tennis related ebooks from this site ever since. It has worked great with my target audience just as you say it will above in your article.

    Regards,
    David Horne
    eBooks International
  • It is one thing to think and write about the future, as I've been doing. I
    have great admiration for people like you who are acting on it. Just
    remember that community is not just about dividing up offerings, but also
    about finding ways to continually engage the people you attract. You're
    leaving opportunity on the table if you pull people of a common interest
    together and don't enable them to benefit from each other as well as from
    whatever brought them to your door.

    Mike
  • David Horne
    Hi Mike

    I agree about engaging people and bringing them together to benefit from each others knowledge and common interests which is why i am about to release a free site for ebook authors to connect, communicate and collaborate on their ebooks.

    It is different to other self publishing platforms in that it is about providing authors with many opportunities to interact with eachother as well as receive tips and advice for ebook writing, marketing, etc. Other sites are all about business and making money.

    I hope this is a way i can also interact with people who also share my passion for eBooks. Every day i love reading about the news on ebooks, new ideas (such as your great blog) and hope to be able to share my knowledge as well to new authors.

    Who knows exactly where the ebook revolution will end up. I am sure there will be many more twists and turns, but the exciting thing for me is that it has given writers confidence now that they can get their work published and read by others where previously this was unlikely to happen.

    It has put new life in writing, reading and people connecting through a common interest. For anyone who has written, either printed or ebook, and had someone read or buy their work with positive feedback is a very rewarding feeling. I hope all your loyal readers act on their dreams! Keep up the great articles! All the best.
  • Good idea, David. I definitely think you could have some takers for a web
    site by which ebook self-publishers could learn from each other's
    experiences. Keep us posted at info@idealog.com when you're up and running.

    Mike
  • marytod
    Hi Mike – today’s post is full of exciting concepts which in turn prompt further understanding of industry change. I’m not yet sure how to connect the dots but here are a few comments:
    • The curator you describe seems similar to a NY Times reviewer in the assurance they offer that a particular product (in this case a book) will fit the needs of a community member. How will the curator combine breadth of offering with selectivity? Will the curator rotate selections as is the practice in museums and art galleries?
    • The book is changing from a stand-alone entity to an entity combined with other desirable content, product and services. I have an easier time imagining how this works for non-fiction than I do for fiction. Can you comment on the realm of fiction.
    • Who offers the higher value-add, F+W or Ingram? How do you expect this to play out in terms of profitability?
    • Do you expect curators to come in many flavours? It seems to me that specialty websites, bloggers, online goods retailers, Facebook groups and others could perform the role of curator.
    • Will the business model evolve into a hub and spoke, chain or network configuration?

    Thanks for such a great post.
  • You ask a lot of good questions. Let me take them one by one.

    • The curator you describe seems similar to a NY Times reviewer in the
    assurance they offer that a particular product (in this case a book) will
    fit the needs of a community member. How will the curator combine breadth of
    offering with selectivity? Will the curator rotate selections as is the
    practice in museums and art galleries?

    MS: There will be as many different approaches are there are web sites. What
    I'm suggesting is that it is natural for people with audiences to want to
    offer things for sale and it is natural for them to recommend content. I
    think we'll see a situation evolve where that will become commonplace as
    capabilities and the spread of emerging good practices evolve.

    • The book is changing from a stand-alone entity to an entity combined with
    other desirable content, product and services. I have an easier time
    imagining how this works for non-fiction than I do for fiction. Can you
    comment on the realm of fiction.

    Fiction's pretty simple. Goodreads will have a bookstore; or maybe lots of
    individual people inside Goodreads will have bookstores. Don't think of
    these things the way you think of bookstores now. Just think in terms that
    anybody who wants to can offer you books, with their presentation and
    annotation, and you can expect to find books offered to you in many places.
    And yes, whatever "books" become...

    • Who offers the higher value-add, F+W or Ingram? How do you expect this to
    play out in terms of profitability?

    Hard to compare those two. Remembering that I don't know the details of the
    deal (and I really don't): Ingram offers a service. They have the deals with
    all the publishers for the ebooks and books, they have the database to
    create the online presentation. They have the entire back end to enable the
    commerce. F+W has audiences gathered by subject and some experience selling
    their own books to those audiences. I guess the merchandising and marketing
    at this point is strictly up to F+W, but Ingram can be offering the same
    basket of opportunity to other entities. The challenge for F+W is to use the
    tools Ingram gives them to sell lots of books and ebooks. The challenge for
    Ingram is to figure out what makes a successful client and to do what they
    need to do to develop more of them.

    • Do you expect curators to come in many flavours? It seems to me that
    specialty websites, bloggers, online goods retailers, Facebook groups and
    others could perform the role of curator.

    Exactly. Given the right tool set attached to the right capabilities, I'd
    imagine anybody can become a curator.

    • Will the business model evolve into a hub and spoke, chain or network
    configuration?

    Actually, it could elements of all three. You have a bunch of entities to
    play the Ingram role and each will be trying to set up their own
    hub-and-spoke relationships. But it isn't hard to imagine "chains"
    developing at the "spoke" level. And since I'd expect product generation to
    start happening from the network (the "spokes"), that would add an aspect of
    "network" configuration to the evolutionary process.

    Mike
  • marytod
    Amazingly dynamic world we are in. Thanks for the time you took to reply.
  • I do see the expansion of "affiliate-type" e-book sales, especially with two new announcements from Amazon: Kindle Previewer for HTML 5 (which allows users to sample e-books in their web browsers), and Web Widgets, which allow anyone to easily add those Kindle book previews to their own websites. Visitors can preview and purchase books directly from the web widget -- without even leaving the site. I'm sure vertical retailers will like the idea of being able to sell e-books from their own websites without having to send customers off to Amazon.

    http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum/ref=cm_cd_tfp_ef_tft_tp?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&cdThread=TxWSYBYWWCW1OJ&displayType=tagsDetail
  • David, Amazon definitely takes a step in the right direction with this move.
    But I think it is just a step.

    Indeed, sites will want to offer content to their site visitors without
    sending them "away." And sites will also want to know exactly what people
    are buying to help them work their vertical communities more effectively.
    The current affiliate model doesn't really deliver that.

    Mike
  • Dick
    Mike,

    In general your positions are "spot on" as another just mentioned, but you have a tendancy to ignore the importance of retailing skills, which gives your suggestions far too much weight for non-retail savy techies or distribution types.

    The real secret of Amazon was their willingness to sell below cost to accumulate customers, and skill on keeping them once they were in the fold. Don't forget Amazon lost $2 billion before they started making money. I think the ability to attract the $2 billion under those circumstances had more to do with their success than selection. But your are probably right, the days of consolidation may be over.

    While it is likely there will be 5 million sellers of books, who are also very good retailers in other fields, just slitting the offerings of "not-so-good-at-retailing" publishers or distributors into 200 verticle parts isn't going to attract customers than keeping them together.

    Dick
  • Dick,

    There's no question that the retailing skills are a serious aspect of this
    challenge. And there are many such skills. But two of them, at least, are 1)
    aggregating a customer base and 2) knowing them and what they're interested
    in. Do you think any bookseller can aggregate the sports-loving audience
    that ESPN or Sportsline have? And how many booksellers have the domain
    knowledge of that audience that one of those organizations can provide?

    My hunch is that over time it will be much easier for the vertical community
    to develop and harness the retailing (merchandising) skills than it will be
    for a "bookseller" to develop the customer loyalty and vertical knowledge,
    niche by niche, that will be required.

    I don't disagree with you about Amazon. You probably remember, as I do, that
    in the late 1990s it was fashionable to suggest that publishers organize
    their own retailer to go direct to the consumers. This was at the very time
    that Amazon was subsidizing a huge infrastructure build and deep discounts
    to the consumer with the investment capital provided by Wall Street. It
    seemed nuts at the time (and still does.)

    But Amazon was built in a different time. There were few developed niche
    communities in which to place book offerings then, and the limitations of
    technology would have made it difficult, not to mention that the whole idea
    works much better for ebook delivery than for print. I don't think the
    paradigm will hold as we evolve.

    The ultimate answer to what you're saying is that I'm not expecting the 200
    vertical parts to attract an audience with their retailing or merchandising
    skill; I expect them to *serve* an audience they already gathered with their
    community-building (or content provision) skill. The equation changes
    dramatically when pulling the customers in the door isn't the first
    requirement.

    Mike
  • Kobo 'powers' Borders' new ereader. But yeah, spot-on. This is what we were aiming for with the tor dot com bookstore, but we never could get it off the ground—too tied up in larger politics within Macmillan.
  • Pablo, I was excited when Tor.com announced the plan to do this a year ago.
    I didn't mention it because I feared it had come to naught. I have a feeling
    it will arise again but too bad you didn't get to pull it off while you were
    there.

    Mike
  • Richard
    I believe Kobo powers the Borders ebook store.
  • Richard, indeed Kobo *does* power the Borders bookstore. And they have
    partnerships that mean they'll be doing that around the world. I should have
    mentioned that.

    Mike
  • Right on. Anyone who ever sold a design book through Pottery Barn understands the power of providing a book purchase option in the context of another experience. No reason it should be different for eBooks. In fact, it may be even more powerful that it ever was in the print world.
  • Thanks, Frank. Yes, I think it *will* be more powerful than it was in the
    print, or brick-and-mortar, world.

    Mike
  • I couldnt agree more Mike. We saw this coming last year and have over a dozen orders for white-label speciality eBook sites tying in with our customers websites/communities.

    Now if we could only get round this pesky DRM...........
  • I'm with you on this Mike! Seems sensible, logical and likely!
    Eoin
  • Thanks for saying so, Eoin. When you're out there with something you haven't
    read anyplace else, voices saying "you're not crazy" are always appreciated.

    Mike
blog comments powered by Disqus

Go Back | Top